Rambo and Bond in America's Geopolitical Narrative

openart.ai generated image

Heroes or Hegemons? The Celluloid Empire of Rambo and Bond in America's Geopolitical Narrative

The Rambo and James Bond film franchises have often acted as powerful vehicles for promoting American geopolitical perspectives, especially during the Cold War and the subsequent era of globalization. Through these films, Hollywood has wielded significant soft power, shaping global perceptions of American values, ideology, and military might in ways that align with broader U.S. foreign policy objectives.

Rambo Franchise: From Vietnam to Afghanistan

• Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) and Rambo III (1988) are the most explicit in advancing an American geopolitical narrative. 
  • Rambo: First Blood Part II revisits the Vietnam War, portraying the United States as seeking redemption for its past humiliation, with the Vietnamese depicted as villains. The film suggests that American soldiers were betrayed by their own government but remained heroic, ultimately triumphing over communism.

• • Rambo III shifts the setting to Afghanistan, where John Rambo aids the Mujahideen against the Soviet Union. This narrative aligns closely with U.S. support for Afghan rebels during the Soviet-Afghan War, presenting the conflict as a moral crusade against communism and promoting the idea of America as a global liberator.

Rambo in Afghanistan

James Bond Franchise: Western Interests and Global Narratives

• Although James Bond is a British creation, the series often aligns with broader Western geopolitical interests, particularly during the Cold War.
  • The Living Daylights (1987) features Bond assisting Afghan rebels, echoing the narrative of Rambo III. This alignment with Western support for the Mujahideen positions Bond as a defender of Western interests against Soviet expansion.
  • Licence to Kill (1989), while less overtly political, addresses Western concerns about drug cartels, indirectly supporting U.S. policies in the War on Drugs.
  • Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) explores themes of media manipulation and control of information, reflecting U.S. concerns about maintaining narrative dominance in the post-Cold War world.

Soft Power and the U.S. as an Empire

These films served as tools of soft power in several key ways:

1. Projecting Ideology: Both franchises reinforced the narrative of the United States (and the broader West) as defenders of freedom, democracy, and human rights, often positioning American (or allied) characters as the moral center of the story.
2. Cultural Hegemony: Through widespread global distribution, these films normalized American values and geopolitical perspectives, subtly influencing audiences worldwide and perpetuating a pro-Western worldview.
3. Economic Influence: The commercial success of these franchises showcased the appeal of American cultural products, helping to maintain U.S. dominance in global entertainment markets and reinforcing the economic aspect of American hegemony.
4. Global Perception: By depicting U.S. military and intelligence agencies as supremely competent and just, these films enhanced the perception of American power and legitimacy on the global stage.

In the era of globalization, the Rambo and James Bond franchises contributed significantly to the narrative of the United States as a benevolent global superpower, using entertainment to subtly align global audiences with American interests and worldview. Whether perceived as heroes or hegemons, these iconic characters and their stories have played a crucial role in crafting America's celluloid empire, influencing how the world sees U.S. power and purpose.

In this context, the legacy of franchises like Rambo and James Bond illustrates how Hollywood has historically positioned the United States as a benevolent global superpower, subtly aligning audiences with American interests and worldview. This mastery of soft power is precisely what Palki Sharma in the Gravitas Plus video highlights, as she calls for Bollywood to similarly project India's narrative on the global stage. However, while this suggestion acknowledges the effectiveness of Hollywood's strategies, it also raises a critical question: should other film industries, like Bollywood, simply replicate this hegemonic approach?

Palki Sharma in this Gravitas Plus:How India can harness the soft power of Bollywood video discusses how America effectively uses Hollywood as a tool of soft power to shape global perceptions and spread the "American Dream." The speaker, Palki Sharma, argues that India should leverage Bollywood similarly to project India's narrative and enhance its soft power. However, her critique focuses on an essential point that is often overlooked in such discussions: the dangers of mimicking hegemonic practices without critical reflection.

Her arguments suggest that while Hollywood’s influence is undeniable, its approach—often portraying America as the global hero—can reinforce a hegemonic narrative that marginalizes other perspectives. Encouraging Bollywood or any other film industry to adopt a similar approach risks perpetuating these hegemonic dynamics rather than challenging them.

Instead of pushing for Bollywood to replicate Hollywood's methods, the focus should be on critiquing and deconstructing these dominant narratives. Bollywood and other film industries have the potential to offer alternative perspectives, tell stories that challenge existing power structures, and provide a platform for voices that are often silenced or ignored in mainstream global cinema.

By critiquing and resisting hegemonic narratives, rather than mimicking them, film industries like Bollywood can play a significant role in fostering a more diverse and inclusive global discourse. This approach aligns with the idea that storytelling should not only reflect cultural identities but also question and challenge the status quo, offering new ways of seeing and understanding the world.