The Intentional Fallacy: Wimsatt and Beardsley’s Approach to the Meaning of Poetry
Literary Criticism | New Criticism | Study Material for English Literature Students
Introduction: Does the Poet Know Best What the Poem Means?
Suppose you are reading a poem about a bird sitting in a cage. You interpret the bird as a symbol of freedom and the cage as a symbol of social restrictions. However, when you ask the poet about the poem, the poet says, “I was simply describing a bird I saw in my garden. I had no intention of writing about freedom.”
Should you change your interpretation?
Or suppose the poet tells you that the bird represents freedom. Does this automatically make that interpretation correct?
These questions take us to one of the most influential ideas in modern literary criticism: the Intentional Fallacy, proposed by W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley.
Their central argument is that the meaning and value of a literary work should not be determined by the author's private intentions. Instead, readers should examine the poem itself—its words, images, structure, patterns, and relationships.
In simple terms:
To understand a poem, read the poem—not the poet's mind.
4
1. Who Were W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley?
William K. Wimsatt (1907–1975)
An American literary critic associated with New Criticism. He emphasised close reading and the analysis of literary works as verbal constructions.
Monroe C. Beardsley (1915–1985)
An American philosopher and aesthetician whose work explored the nature of art, meaning, and literary interpretation.
Wimsatt and Beardsley published their influential essay “The Intentional Fallacy” in 1946. It was subsequently included in their book The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (1954).
The essay became a foundational text of New Criticism, a critical movement that focuses on the literary work itself rather than on the author's biography, personal feelings, or historical circumstances as the primary basis for interpretation.
Their argument challenges a familiar assumption: that the author's intention must be the final authority on what a poem means.
2. What Is the Intentional Fallacy?
The term intentional fallacy refers to the mistake of treating the author's intention as the definitive standard for interpreting or evaluating a literary work.
Wimsatt and Beardsley argue that once a poem has been written and made public, it becomes an independent verbal object. Its meaning must be examined through the language and structure of the poem, rather than through the private intentions of its creator.
They famously describe the poem as:
“not the critic's own and not the author's”
The point is that a poem belongs to the public world of language and literature. Readers encounter the poem through its words, not through direct access to the poet's private thoughts.
A simple example
Imagine that a poet writes these lines:
The locked door waits in silence, While morning fills the street.
A reader interprets the locked door as a symbol of isolation and the morning as a symbol of hope.
The poet later explains, “I intended the door to represent a person's fear of change.”
According to the principle of the intentional fallacy, the poet's explanation may be interesting, but it does not automatically settle the poem's meaning.
The reader must still ask:
Does the image of the locked door support the idea of fear or isolation?
Does the contrast between the door and the morning suggest a conflict between confinement and possibility?
Do the words, images, and structure support the interpretation?
The poem's language provides the evidence.
3. The Two Types of Evidence: Internal and External
Wimsatt and Beardsley's argument encourages us to distinguish between evidence found within the poem and information obtained from outside it.
Internal evidence
Primary focus
The poem's words, imagery, metaphors, tone, rhythm, structure, contrasts, and patterns of meaning.
External evidence
The poet's letters, interviews, diaries, personal statements, and accounts of what the poet intended.
For Wimsatt and Beardsley, a critic should not substitute external evidence of intention for an analysis of the literary work.
This does not mean that all historical or biographical information is useless. It means that the author's private intention cannot serve as the final authority on the meaning or value of the poem.
4. Why Is It Called a “Fallacy”?
A fallacy is an error in reasoning. The intentional fallacy occurs when a reader assumes that knowing what the author intended is necessary or sufficient to establish what a literary work means.
Consider three situations:
|
Situation
|
Why it can be problematic
|
| --- | --- |
|
The poet says, “This poem is about hope.”
|
The statement does not prove that hope is the only meaning supported by the poem.
|
|
The poet says, “I did not intend any political meaning.”
|
The poem may nevertheless contain language or imagery that supports a political interpretation.
|
|
The poet explains a personal experience behind the poem.
|
The experience may illuminate the poem's origin without exhausting its literary meaning.
|
The important distinction is between what the author intended to write and what the poem, as a verbal work, makes available for interpretation.
A poem can communicate implications, tensions, or meanings that extend beyond the poet's conscious plan.
5. Extension and Intension: Understanding the Meaning of Words in Poetry
To understand how a poem can communicate more than its literal subject, it is useful to explore two concepts: extension and intension.
These terms are not the central concepts of Wimsatt and Beardsley's essay. They belong to a broader discussion of meaning and semantics. However, they offer a useful way to demonstrate how a poem's language can produce meanings beyond the objects it names.
A. What is Extension?
Extension refers to the things, objects, persons, or entities to which a word or expression applies.
It concerns the referents of a word: what the word points to in the world or in an imagined situation.
For example:
The extension of rose includes actual roses.
The extension of bird includes birds of different species.
The extension of river includes rivers such as the Ganges, the Thames, and the Nile.
In poetry, a word may refer to a real object while also participating in a larger network of meanings.
Illustration 1: The Rose
Consider these illustrative lines:
A rose blooms beside the wall, Its petals open to the sun.
At the level of extension, the word rose refers to a flowering plant.
The poem presents a recognisable object: a rose growing beside a wall. We can identify its petals, its location, and its relationship to sunlight.
But is the poem only about a flower?
Not necessarily. The rose may also suggest beauty, love, youth, fragility, or the temporary nature of life. These additional associations take us towards intension and connotation.
5
B. What is Intension?
Intension refers to the qualities, characteristics, or conceptual content associated with a word.
It concerns what we understand a word to mean, rather than simply the objects to which it refers.
For example, the intension of rose may include qualities such as:
A flowering plant.
Soft, colourful petals.
Fragrance.
Beauty.
Thorns, in many varieties.
In a literary context, a word's intension can become enriched by the associations it acquires through imagery, symbolism, tone, and context.
Illustration 2: The Rose as Love and Suffering
Consider these lines:
I gave you roses in the spring, Their thorns remained when petals fell.
The extension of roses remains the same: the flowers being given.
However, the intension of the image becomes more complex. The roses may suggest affection and beauty, while the thorns and falling petals introduce pain, loss, and the passing of time.
The poem creates a tension between love and suffering.
Notice that the interpretation does not depend on discovering whether the poet personally intended the roses to represent a failed relationship. The reader can examine the contrast between petals and thorns, giving and loss, and spring and falling.
The language itself provides grounds for interpretation.
C. Extension and Intension Compared
Extension
Intension
What does the word refer to?
The object or entity named.
What does the word convey?
Its qualities and conceptual associations.
Rose
A flowering plant.
Rose
Beauty, love, fragility, or pain, depending on context.
Cage
An enclosure for confining an animal.
Cage
Confinement, restriction, or lack of freedom.
Winter
The coldest season of the year.
Winter
Coldness, decline, loneliness, or the end of a phase.
A note on terminology
In semantics, extension and intension have more precise technical definitions. In literary interpretation, it is helpful to use the distinction as a starting point: extension directs attention to reference, while intension directs attention to the qualities and conceptual content of the expression.
Literary associations are also shaped by connotation, culture, and context. Intension and connotation are related, but they should not be treated as identical in every theoretical framework.
6. How Extension and Intension Help Us Understand the Intentional Fallacy
Let us bring the two discussions together.
Consider the following original illustrative poem:
The Cage
The bird beats softly at the bars, The morning opens into blue. Beyond the cage, the restless sky Waits for wings to travel through.
Step 1: Identify the extension
What do the words refer to?
Bird: a feathered animal.
Bars: the physical boundaries of the cage.
Morning: the early part of the day.
Sky: the visible expanse above the earth.
Wings: the bird's body parts used for flight.
At the level of extension, the poem presents a bird confined within a cage, looking towards the open sky.
Step 2: Explore the intension and associations
Now consider the qualities and associations of these words.
|
Image
|
Possible associations
|
| --- | --- |
|
Cage
|
Confinement, restriction, imprisonment
|
|
Bird
|
Life, individuality, vulnerability
|
|
Open sky
|
Freedom, possibility, limitless space
|
|
Wings
|
Movement, agency, the capacity to escape
|
|
Morning
|
Renewal, hope, a new beginning
|
The contrast between the cage and the open sky creates a conflict between confinement and freedom.
The bird's movement towards the bars suggests a desire to escape. The sky becomes a space of possibility.
Step 3: Consider the poet's intention
Imagine that the poet says:
“I wrote this poem only because I was watching a bird in a cage. I did not intend to make a statement about freedom.”
Would this statement cancel the interpretation of the cage as confinement or the sky as freedom?
According to the principle of the intentional fallacy, it would not.
The reader's interpretation is supported by the poem's language, especially the contrast between bars and open, cage and sky, and confined movement and travel.
The poet's statement about the poem's origin does not remove these textual relationships.
Step 4: Consider an alternative interpretation
A different reader might interpret the cage as protection rather than oppression. Perhaps the bird is safe inside, while the sky represents danger and uncertainty.
Is this interpretation possible?
It depends on the textual evidence. The poem's phrases “beats softly at the bars” and “Waits for wings to travel through” suggest a desire for movement beyond the cage. Therefore, an interpretation centred on freedom has substantial textual support.
This illustrates an important point: not every interpretation is equally supported simply because the author's intention is not the final authority. A reading must still account for the words and structure of the poem.
7. The Intentional Fallacy and William Wordsworth's “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”
Let us now apply this approach to a familiar poem.
William Wordsworth's “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud” presents a speaker who encounters a field of daffodils beside a lake. The flowers appear to dance in the breeze, and the memory of the scene later brings pleasure when the speaker is alone.
The poem is often discussed in relation to nature, memory, imagination, and emotional renewal.
Extension: What do the words refer to?
The poem refers to recognisable elements of the natural world:
Daffodils growing beside a lake.
Trees and a breeze.
The movement of flowers.
The speaker's experience of seeing the landscape.
The later recollection of the scene.
At the level of extension, we can identify a natural setting and an encounter with flowers.
Intension: What meanings do these images develop?
The poem's images acquire additional significance through their arrangement and language.
|
Image
|
Interpretive possibilities
|
| --- | --- |
|
Daffodils
|
Beauty, vitality, the abundance of nature
|
|
Dancing flowers
|
Movement, joy, animation
|
|
The lake and breeze
|
A natural world full of movement
|
|
Solitude
|
A condition in which memory becomes important
|
|
Recollection
|
The capacity of memory to renew pleasure
|
The flowers are not merely objects in a landscape. Their movement, abundance, and later recollection contribute to the poem's exploration of the relationship between nature and the human mind.
Where does the intentional fallacy enter?
Suppose a reader claims that the poem is about the restorative power of memory. Another reader argues that it is primarily about the imaginative transformation of an ordinary encounter with nature.
The critic should examine the poem's imagery, movement, contrast, and final reflection to evaluate these interpretations.
A statement about what Wordsworth intended to communicate may provide historical or biographical context, but it does not replace close reading.
The poem's meaning emerges through its verbal construction.
8. What the Intentional Fallacy Does Not Mean
The theory is sometimes misunderstood. Let us clarify a few common misconceptions.
It does not mean that the author is irrelevant.
The author's life and historical context may help us understand the circumstances in which a poem was written. The argument is against treating private intention as the final standard of interpretation.
It does not mean that readers can invent any meaning.
Interpretations must be supported by textual evidence. A reading that ignores the poem's language and structure is not justified merely because it differs from the author's stated intention.
It does not mean that the poet's explanation is always false.
The poet may offer a valuable account of the writing process. That account simply does not settle every question about meaning.
It does not mean that a poem has only one possible interpretation.
A poem may sustain several interpretations, provided they are grounded in its language and formal features.
9. The Intentional Fallacy and the Affective Fallacy
Wimsatt and Beardsley also developed another important critical concept: the Affective Fallacy.
The two concepts are related because both challenge approaches that make literary criticism depend primarily on something outside the literary work itself.
|
Intentional Fallacy
|
Affective Fallacy
|
| --- | --- |
|
Focuses on the author's intention.
|
Focuses on the reader's emotional response.
|
|
Asks: “What did the poet intend?”
|
Asks: “How did the poem make me feel?”
|
|
Warns against using intention as the final standard of meaning.
|
Warns against treating personal emotional effects as the final standard of interpretation or evaluation.
|
|
Directs attention towards the poem as a verbal construction.
|
Also directs attention towards the poem as a verbal construction.
|
For example, saying “This poem is great because it made me cry” describes a personal response. A critic working within New Criticism would also examine how the poem's language, imagery, rhythm, and structure produce its effects.
Neither the author's private intention nor the reader's private feelings should replace the critical examination of the poem.
10. A Classroom Activity: Read the Poem, Not the Poet's Mind
The following short poem can be used for postgraduate classroom discussion.
The Empty Chair
The evening light falls on the floor, A cup grows cold beside the door. One empty chair faces the wall, No footsteps answer when shadows fall.
Task 1: Identify the extension
List the concrete objects, actions, and events presented in the poem.
Task 2: Explore intension and associations
What might the empty chair, the cold cup, the evening light, and the silence suggest?
Task 3: Develop an interpretation
Does the poem suggest absence, loneliness, grief, waiting, or something else? Identify the words that support your interpretation.
Task 4: Introduce the poet's intention
Imagine that the poet says, “I intended this poem to describe a person waiting for a friend.”
Does this statement eliminate interpretations involving loneliness or grief? Explain your answer using textual evidence.
Task 5: Evaluate the interpretation
Can a reader interpret the empty chair as a symbol of death? What evidence supports or limits this reading?
The purpose is not to discover the one hidden answer in the poet's mind. It is to develop a reasoned interpretation that accounts for the poem's language.
11. Quick Revision Notes
Remember these key points
W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley developed the concept of the Intentional Fallacy.
Their essay “The Intentional Fallacy” was published in 1946.
The author's intention should not be treated as the final authority on a poem's meaning or value.
The poem should be analysed as a verbal work through its words, images, patterns, and structure.
Extension concerns what a word refers to; intension concerns its conceptual content and qualities.
Poetic language can suggest meanings beyond the literal objects it names.
Interpretations must be supported by textual evidence, not merely by a reader's preference.
The Affective Fallacy concerns the danger of making a reader's emotional response the final standard of criticism.
Conclusion: The Poem Is More Than the Poet's Explanation
The Intentional Fallacy invites us to reconsider a familiar assumption about literature: that the person who writes a poem must possess the final authority over its meaning.
Wimsatt and Beardsley direct our attention away from the poet's private intentions and towards the poem as a public verbal construction. The critic's task is to examine how language produces meaning through imagery, rhythm, structure, contrast, and the relationships between words.
The distinction between extension and intension helps us understand this process. A word may refer to a simple object, such as a rose, a cage, or an empty chair, while its place in a poem allows it to suggest love, confinement, grief, freedom, or hope.
These meanings must be established through the poem's language rather than simply attributed to the poet's private thoughts.
The central lesson of New Criticism is simple: an interpretation becomes persuasive not because the poet confirms it, but because the poem supports it.
Suggested Reading
Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 54, no. 3, 1946, pp. 468–488.
Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley. The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. University of Kentucky Press, 1954.
Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley. “The Affective Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review, vol. 57, no. 1, 1949, pp. 31–55.
For further study: Compare the Intentional Fallacy with reader-response criticism, which gives greater attention to the reader's role in producing literary meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment