Hypothesis - PhD Coursework

Research Hypothesis

Dilip Barad

Abstract:

This comprehensive lecture series delves into the multifaceted realm of hypotheses in academic research, encompassing their origins, formulations, analyses, and applications. Hypothesis-I traces the linguistic roots of the term "hypothesis" to its Latin and Greek foundations, elucidating its role as a tentative proposition subject to empirical scrutiny. Emphasizing its significance as an initial step in scientific investigation, the lecture underscores the necessity of clear definitions and operational terms, delineating hypotheses from established theories. In Hypothesis-II, the discourse expands to examine hypotheses in both quantitative and qualitative research. In qualitative studies, hypotheses aid in unearthing thematic patterns, while their quantitative counterparts guide rigorous variable analysis. Hypothesis-III, the third installment, delves into crafting effective research questions and hypotheses. A thorough differentiation between quantitative and qualitative paradigms unfolds, encompassing diverse question and hypothesis types. The lecture series culminates in Hypothesis-IV, where pragmatic considerations in developing hypotheses take the spotlight. Ethical, feasible, and relevant criteria are probed, bolstered by frameworks like PICOT and FINER MAPS. The construction of impactful research questions and hypotheses is elucidated through a six-step process, which harmonizes contextual understanding, problem identification, preliminary research, hypothesis formulation, and study aim articulation. This comprehensive exposition navigates the nuanced landscape of hypotheses, concurrently mapping their evolution from nascent propositions to research catalysts across diverse academic domains.

Keywords:

 hypothesis, academic research, qualitative research, quantitative research, research questions, frameworks

 Hypothesis - Ph.D. Coursework

1. Hypothesis - I:

• The lecture is about the topic of hypothesis in academic research.
• The etymology of the word "hypothesis" is traced back to Latin and Greek roots, emphasizing its foundation and groundwork.
• A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction about the relationship between variables.
• It is a statement that can be tested through scientific research and requires specific definitions and operational terms.
• A hypothesis is not a proven theory or fact, but a starting point for further investigation and is subject to revision based on research findings.

If the video is not played here, please visit this link to watch the video: https://youtu.be/guv8WVXXnZk

Summary:

In this lecture on PhD coursework, Professor Dilip Barad discusses the topic of hypothesis in academic research. The etymology of the word "hypothesis" reveals its Latin and Greek roots, highlighting the importance of laying a foundation for research. A hypothesis is not merely a preposition, but rather a result of groundwork and scientific thinking.

A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction about the relationship between variables. It is based on limited evidence and requires further testing and verification. Variables play a crucial role in hypothesis formulation, with independent variables being the ones that can be changed, dependent variables being what is observed or measured, and controlled variables being the ones that remain constant.

A hypothesis is not a proven theory or fact, but rather a starting point for further investigation. It requires scientific research and testing to determine its validity. If research findings do not support the hypothesis, it may need to be revised or even abandoned. Hypotheses inform the collection of relevant data and enhance objectivity in research.

It is important to differentiate between a hypothesis and a proven theory. A hypothesis is falsifiable and subject to empirical testing, whereas a theory has been extensively supported by evidence. The lecture also touches on the challenges of verifying hypotheses in qualitative research and the meaningfulness of hypotheses in different fields like ethics and aesthetics.

Overall, the lecture emphasizes the significance of hypothesis in academic research as a tool for making predictions, guiding data collection, and advancing scientific understanding.

2. Hypothesis-II:

• The speaker discusses the purpose and analysis of hypothesis in quantitative and qualitative research.
• In qualitative research, hypothesis formulation helps uncover themes and develop a general understanding of the topic.
• In quantitative research, hypothesis testing and confirmation play a vital role in narrowing down variables and producing high-quality data.
• If the video is not playing or visible here, click this link to watch video: https://youtu.be/ISpza-aXRd8

Summary:

The speaker, Professor Dilip Bharat, discusses the purpose and analysis of hypothesis in both quantitative and qualitative research.

In qualitative research, the purpose of a hypothesis is to formulate a general understanding of a topic and uncover themes. It helps researchers obtain deeper information about a subject and serves as a foundation for developing research questions and hypotheses. Qualitative research often precedes quantitative research, providing a baseline understanding that allows for the formulation of hypotheses related to correlation and causation. While quantitative researchers consider hypotheses essential, qualitative researchers primarily use them to frame their analysis and interpret the data, moving from a hypothesis to a broader theory.

On the other hand, in quantitative research, hypotheses play a crucial role in testing and confirming expected outcomes. These hypotheses are educated statements based on background research and current knowledge. They make specific predictions about the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Quantitative research relies on statistical analysis and structured data sets, often analyzed using software tools like Excel, R, or SPSS. Hypothesis formulation in quantitative research helps narrow down variables and ensures a controlled research outline to generate high-quality data.

The analysis of data differs between qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research generates highly textual data, where researchers identify key themes and patterns by reading and analyzing the text. In contrast, quantitative research produces data sets that can be analyzed using statistical software and includes factors such as ratings, rankings, and metrics. The analysis approaches and questions raised from the data also vary between the two research types.

The transcript highlights the interconnectedness between research questions and hypotheses. Research questions aim to answer specific aspects of a study after data analysis and interpretation. In qualitative research, research questions hold great importance, particularly for fields like literature, psychology, sociology, and history, where interpretations play a significant role. In quantitative research, research questions are fewer, and hypotheses take precedence, providing specific predictions to be tested and explored.

In summary, the lecture explains that the purpose and analysis of hypotheses differ in quantitative and qualitative research. Qualitative research employs hypotheses to uncover themes and develop a general understanding, while quantitative research relies on hypotheses to test and confirm expected outcomes. The analysis of data also varies, with qualitative research focusing on textual analysis and quantitative research utilizing statistical tools. The lecture emphasizes the interconnectedness between research questions and hypotheses, with qualitative research placing more emphasis on research questions and quantitative research prioritizing hypotheses.

3. Hypothesis-III

• This is Part 3 of a lecture series on hypothesis in academic research for a PhD coursework.
• The speaker discusses the characteristics of good research questions and hypotheses.
• It explains the differences between quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses.
• Quantitative research questions can be descriptive, comparative, or relationship-based, while qualitative research questions can be contextual, descriptive, evaluative, explanatory, or generative.
• The transcript also mentions different types of quantitative and qualitative hypotheses, such as simple, complex, directional, associative, null, and alternative hypotheses.
• If the video is not playing or not visible, please click this link to watch video: https://youtu.be/aSuEWblkjJc

Summary:

In Part 3 of the lecture series on hypothesis in academic research for a PhD coursework, the speaker, Professor Dilip, discusses the characteristics of good research questions and hypotheses. He emphasizes that excellent research questions should be specific and focused, integrating collective data and observations to confirm or refute subsequent hypotheses. On the other hand, good hypotheses should be empirically testable, backed by preliminary evidence, testable by ethical research, based on original ideas, supported by evidence-based logical reasoning, and capable of being predicted.

The lecture further explores the differences between quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses. Quantitative research questions can fall into three categories: descriptive, comparative, and relationship-based. In contrast, qualitative research questions cover a broader range, including contextual, descriptive, evaluative, explanatory, and generative questions. It is interesting to note that while quantitative research questions generate multiple hypotheses due to the various variables involved, qualitative research questions typically generate only one hypothesis.

The lecture provides examples of different types of hypotheses for both quantitative and qualitative research. For quantitative research, these include simple, complex, directional, associative, null, and alternative hypotheses. Each type of hypothesis serves a distinct purpose, such as predicting relationships, describing interdependencies, or clarifying differences. In qualitative research, hypotheses may emerge from the exploration of subjective experiences, allowing for the formulation of formal hypotheses that can be tested in future quantitative approaches.

The speaker also highlights the importance of understanding the natural context of real-world problems and tailoring research questions and hypotheses accordingly. He discusses examples such as the experiences of nurses working night shifts during the COVID-19 pandemic or the forms of disrespect and abuse experienced by individuals in specific contexts.

Overall, this part of the lecture series delves into the technicalities of understanding hypotheses in academic research. While the information may not directly apply to all research endeavors, it provides valuable insights for formulating research questions and hypotheses in various contexts.

4. Hypothesis-IV:

• The video is from the fourth and final part of a Ph.D. coursework on research questions and hypotheses wherein the criteria for developing research questions and hypotheses, including feasibility, interest, novelty, ethics, and relevance are discussed.
• It mentions frameworks such as PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time Frame) and FINER MAPS (Feasibility, Interest, Novelty, Ethical, Relevant, Manageable, Appropriate, Potential Value, Publishable, Systematic).
• The video outlines six important points for constructing effective research questions and hypotheses, including clarifying the background, identifying the research problem, conducting preliminary research, constructing research questions, formulating hypotheses, and stating the study aims.
• The video also highlights the differences between quantitative and qualitative research in terms of forming research questions, hypotheses, and conclusions.
  
• If the video is not visible or not playing here, please click this link to watch the video: https://youtu.be/MQZwXqwq3H0

Summary:

This is the final part of a Ph.D. coursework on research questions and hypotheses. The video emphasizes the importance of developing research questions and hypotheses that meet certain criteria. It introduces frameworks like PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time Frame) and FINER MAPS (Feasibility, Interest, Novelty, Ethical, Relevant, Manageable, Appropriate, Potential Value, Publishable, Systematic) to guide the process.

The video outlines six key points for constructing effective research questions and hypotheses. Firstly, it is essential to clarify the background of the study. Secondly, researchers need to identify the research problem within a specific time frame. Thirdly, conducting preliminary research and reviewing existing knowledge is crucial to formulating research questions. Fourthly, researchers should construct specific research questions that investigate the identified problems and identify the necessary variables for assessment. Fifthly, researchers need to formulate specific deductive or inductive predictions in the form of hypotheses. Finally, they should state the aims of the study.

The video also distinguishes between quantitative and qualitative research in terms of forming research questions, hypotheses, and conclusions. For quantitative research, researchers need to test or verify hypotheses, whereas qualitative research focuses on formulating research questions and choosing appropriate methods, sites, and subjects for the study. The conclusion of a qualitative study can lead to the formulation of new hypotheses for further research.

Overall, the video provides guidance on developing research questions and hypotheses that adhere to specific criteria and outlines the step-by-step process for constructing them. It emphasizes the importance of conducting preliminary research, formulating clear and specific questions, and differentiates the approaches between quantitative and qualitative research.

References

Barroga, E., & Matanguihan, G. J. (2022). A Practical Guide to             Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and             Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles. Journal of Korean Medical             Science, 37(16). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e121

Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. John Wiley & Sons.

Feynman, Richard (1965) The Character of Physical Law p.156

Grinnell, F. (2013). Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 685-701. T

Harper, Douglas. "hypothesis". Online Etymology Dictionary.

Hilborn, Ray; Mangel, Marc (1997). The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-691-03497-3. Retrieved 22 August 2011.

Kerlinger, P., & Lein, M. R. (1986). Differences in Winter Range among age-sex Classes of Snowy Owls Nyctea scandiaca in North America. Ornis Scandinavica (Scandinavian Journal of Ornithology), 17(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676745

Mellor, Will. (2022). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research — Here’s What You Need to Know. GLG. https://glginsights.com/articles/qualitative-vs-quantitative-research-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

Popper, Karl (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2002 pbk; 2005 ebook ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-27844-7.