The contradictory Myths of Ganesh and Kartikeya and the ever elusive truth
When we encounter the diverse and often contradictory ways in which myths, especially those steeped in cultural and religious narratives, are told, we are inevitably led to ponder the elusive nature of truth itself. Myths, by their very essence, resist a singular or definitive interpretation. They are fluid, multifaceted, and deeply reflective of the cultures and contexts from which they arise. The notion of truth, therefore, becomes contested, mutable, and, as Friedrich Nietzsche profoundly suggested, a matter of interpretation rather than an absolute. Nietzsche’s claim that "there are no facts, only interpretations" resonates powerfully when we reflect on how myths have been narrated and preserved over time, embodying a kaleidoscope of perspectives and worldviews.
Consider, for instance, the mythological narratives surrounding the deities Ganesh and Kartikeya. The stories told about these two sons of Shiva and Parvati vary significantly across the cultural landscapes of India, exposing the inherent contradictions that challenge any claim to an ultimate truth. In northern India, Kartikeya, also known as Skanda or Murugan, is predominantly portrayed as an eternal bachelor, a brahmachari, embodying the archetype of ascetic celibacy. Meanwhile, Ganesh is celebrated for his wisdom and is often described in myth as married to Siddhi (spiritual & intellectual power) and Riddhi (wealth), symbolizing his role as a divine householder and source of prosperity.
Contrast this with the narratives in southern India, where Kartikeya, venerated as the powerful warrior god Murugan, is revered as the husband of two consorts, Valli and Devasena, signifying a more intimate connection to earthly and spiritual domains. Here, Ganesh is frequently depicted as a celibate deity, immersed in the meditative pursuit of knowledge and wisdom. These divergent portrayals underscore not just regional differences but also profound philosophical and theological variations that shape the understanding of these deities.
The contradictions in these myths challenge our conception of a fixed, universal truth. They compel us to recognize that what we perceive as "truth" is often a reflection of cultural, historical, and interpretative frameworks. Each retelling of these myths serves a purpose, addresses a particular audience, and is shaped by the values and ideologies of that context. The north-south dichotomy in the portrayal of Ganesh and Kartikeya, therefore, is not simply a matter of narrative inconsistency; it is a powerful illustration of how human cultures use myths to grapple with complex realities, and how these stories are constantly reimagined to convey different meanings.
In a broader sense, these myths illuminate the profound insight that truth is not monolithic. It is not something that can be captured, preserved, or fixed once and for all. Rather, truth is a living, evolving construct, interpreted and reinterpreted through the lenses of language, culture, and human experience. Nietzsche’s philosophical musings on interpretation remind us that the search for a singular, objective truth may be a futile endeavor. Instead, our engagement with myths—be it the tales of Ganesh and Kartikeya or any other mythic narrative—invites us to embrace multiplicity, complexity, and the richness of human imagination. In this view, myths become more than just stories; they become a reflection of the interpretative nature of human existence itself, where every perspective adds a new dimension to the ever-unfolding narrative of truth.
The demographic advantage India holds due to its young and growing population presents both a challenge and an opportunity. As countries like China, Japan, and parts of Europe grapple with aging populations, reduced workforces, and increased dependency ratios, India stands out as a potential powerhouse of human capital. By leveraging its demographic dividend, India can not only drive its own economic growth but also play a pivotal role in addressing global labor shortages. This migration of Indian youth would lead to a diffusion of Indian culture, religion, and social practices worldwide, enriching the global cultural landscape and fostering intercultural understanding.
1. Economic Contributions Abroad and Remittances Back Home
Indian migrants are known for their strong work ethic and high educational achievements, particularly in sectors like technology, healthcare, and finance. By migrating to countries with aging populations and skill gaps, Indian professionals can fill critical roles, thereby contributing to the economies of these host countries. The financial stability they gain also translates into increased remittances sent back to India, strengthening the nation's foreign reserves and contributing to socio-economic development in their home regions.
2. Preserving and Promoting Cultural Heritage
Indian migrants have historically been agents of cultural dissemination, introducing Indian traditions, festivals, and cuisine to new lands. For example, festivals like Diwali and Holi are now celebrated globally, highlighting the Indian diaspora's influence on cultural practices in host countries. Through migration, Indian culture, values, and customs, including family-centric lifestyles, spirituality, and community-oriented living, would find new expressions worldwide, helping to foster a more diverse, multicultural society on a global scale.
3. Strengthening Diplomatic Ties
A global diaspora can enhance India’s soft power, creating networks of cultural and economic exchange that benefit both India and host nations. As Indian migrants integrate into their new communities, they often serve as unofficial ambassadors of their heritage, cultivating goodwill and understanding between nations. This has been observed with the Indian-American community, whose influence has bolstered Indo-U.S. relations. Strengthening such ties worldwide could result in closer diplomatic collaborations and favorable policies benefiting Indians at home and abroad.
4. Supporting Global Innovation and Knowledge Economy
India’s growing pool of tech-savvy, highly educated young professionals aligns with the needs of developed countries facing a shortfall in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) professionals. By migrating, Indian talent can drive innovation, research, and technological advancements globally, thus boosting the knowledge economy and contributing to global progress. Indian expertise in areas such as IT, medicine, and engineering has already transformed industries worldwide, with Indian professionals holding top positions in multinational corporations, educational institutions, and research facilities.
5. Catalyzing Social Change and Cross-Cultural Awareness
Indian migration fosters cross-cultural awareness and challenges stereotypes by promoting a more nuanced understanding of Indian society, spirituality, and ethical values. Exposure to Indian social practices, like non-violence, yoga, and community welfare, introduces new perspectives to societies worldwide. This cultural intermingling encourages tolerance, respect for diversity, and collaborative problem-solving, thus fostering an interconnected global community that transcends geographical and cultural boundaries.
6. Sustainable Development and Population Management in India
Migration can serve as a sustainable solution to India’s population challenges, reducing pressure on resources, infrastructure, and job markets. As younger Indians migrate and send remittances home, these funds can be invested in local development, thereby improving living standards and reducing poverty rates. This population redistribution also alleviates overcrowding, making India’s urban and rural planning efforts more manageable and fostering more sustainable growth.
7. Influence on Global Religious and Philosophical Thought
India’s unique spiritual heritage, encompassing diverse religious and philosophical traditions, has long intrigued the world. Indian migrants serve as living embodiments of this heritage, offering insights into religious philosophies like Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, which emphasize principles like compassion, mindfulness, and unity with nature. The spread of these ideas enriches the spiritual and ethical frameworks of societies worldwide, providing individuals with alternative paths to personal and communal growth.
Conclusion
India’s growing population and youthful demographic are assets that, through migration, can help reshape the global landscape. As Indians integrate into communities around the world, they bring with them a wealth of cultural, social, and economic benefits. This migratory movement, rather than being viewed as a burden or challenge, should be recognized as a unique opportunity to share India’s rich heritage and intellectual capital globally. Embracing and facilitating this demographic advantage will not only benefit India but will also help in building a more culturally inclusive, economically robust, and socially interconnected world.
Worksheet for Postgraduate Students on Cultural Studies
Task: Exploring Contemporary Cultural Concepts
Objective: To critically engage with key concepts in contemporary cultural studies using AI as a learning tool.
Instructions:
Familiarize yourself with the following concepts:
Slow Movement
Dromology
Risk Society
Postfeminism
Hyperreal
Hypermodernism
Cyberfeminism
Posthumanism
Engage with Gemini/ChatGPT: Use the following prompt to initiate a conversation with the AI about each concept:
Prompt: "Explain the concept of [insert concept here] in cultural studies, providing a clear definition, its key characteristics, and a relevant example. Relate this concept to contemporary society and discuss its potential implications."
Analyze the AI's response: Carefully read and evaluate the information provided by the AI. Consider its accuracy, clarity, and comprehensiveness.
Conduct further research: Supplement the AI's response with your own research using academic sources (books, journals, articles).
Write a blog post: Based on your understanding from the AI's response and your own research, write a blog post of approximately 800-1000 words that addresses the following:
A clear and concise explanation of each concept.
Real-world examples that illustrate each concept.
Connections and relationships between the different concepts.
Critical analysis of the concepts and their relevance in contemporary society.
Your own perspectives and insights on the implications of these concepts for the future.
Submission:
Submit your blog post electronically in a Word document or PDF format.
Include a title page with your name, student ID, and the date.
Use a clear and engaging writing style, with proper grammar and spelling.
Cite all sources using a consistent citation style (e.g., MLA, APA).
Assessment Criteria:
Understanding of concepts: Demonstrates a clear and accurate understanding of the key concepts.
Critical analysis: Provides insightful analysis and evaluation of the concepts and their significance.
Real-world application: Effectively uses real-world examples to illustrate the concepts.
Synthesis and connections: Identifies connections and relationships between the different concepts.
Clarity and organization: Presents ideas in a clear, organized, and engaging manner.
Research and referencing: Supports arguments with evidence from credible sources and uses proper citation format.
Tips for Success:
Be specific in your prompts to the AI. The more specific your questions, the more relevant and helpful the responses will be.
Don't rely solely on the AI's responses. Use the AI as a starting point for your research and supplement it with your own exploration of academic sources.
Think critically about the information provided by the AI. Evaluate its accuracy and consider different perspectives.
Use real-world examples to make the concepts more relatable and understandable.
Connect the concepts to your own experiences and observations.
Proofread your blog post carefully before submitting it.
This worksheet provides a structured framework for postgraduate students to engage with complex cultural concepts using AI as a tool for learning and critical thinking. By following these instructions, students can develop a deeper understanding of these concepts and their relevance in contemporary society, while also enhancing their research and writing skills.
Reading Resources:
Slow Movement
Books:
Honoré, Carl. In Praise of Slowness: How a Worldwide Movement Is Challenging the Cult of Speed. HarperOne, 2005.
Parkins, Wendy. The Slow Food Movement: Politics, Pleasure, and the Paradox of Locality. Temple University Press, 2010.
Journal Articles:
Griffiths, Michael B., and Dawn Gilpin. "Slow Tourism: An Alternative Tourism for a Sustainable World." Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 28, no. 7, 2020, pp. 904-918.
TED Talk:
Tim Leberecht: "3 Ways to Practice Slow Leadership" [Video]. TED, [invalid URL removed]. Accessed 12 Oct. 2024.
This list provides a starting point for your research. You can find more resources by searching library databases, online journals, and academic websites. Remember to evaluate the credibility and relevance of each source before using it. Good luck with your exploration of these complex and thought-provoking concepts!
Researcher’s Attitude, Ethics, and Digital Profile Essentials
In today’s rapidly evolving academic landscape, mastering research methodology and ethics is crucial for scholars across disciplines. During the Short Term Course on Research Methodology, participants were introduced to key aspects of developing a strong research attitude, adhering to ethical guidelines in publishing, and leveraging digital tools to enhance their scholarly work. Through three insightful presentations, the course covered fundamental topics such as the vocation of a researcher, the importance of publication ethics, and the use of modern digital platforms for creating a robust academic profile. This blog shares the highlights from these presentations, providing participants with a comprehensive understanding of how to conduct ethical and impactful research in the digital age.
1. Research Attitude and Ethics in Research
This presentation covers the fundamental aspects of research attitude and the role of ethics in the research process. It highlights the difference between a researcher and a scholar, emphasizing the vocation and spirit of scholarship. Participants will explore the mindset required for conducting genuine and ethical research, including the principles of evidence-based research and intellectual curiosity.
Key Concepts:
Vocation of a Scholar: The presentation distinguishes between mere research and the higher calling of scholarship, highlighting the historical sense and intellectual breadth that define true scholarship.
Mental Temperament: Law and Journalism
Assignment Questions:
Discuss the key differences between a researcher and a scholar, and explain why scholarly habits are essential for long-term success in academia.
How does Law and Journalism help in mental makeup of a research scholar in writing thesis / dissertation?
2. Research and Publication Ethics (RPE) and Finding Quality Journals
The final presentation deals with ethics in research and publication, providing guidance on selecting appropriate journals for publication. Ethical issues such as falsifiability, the philosophy of science, and the proper conduct of research are covered.
Key Concepts:
Philosophy of Science: The importance of falsifiability, testability, and verificationism in scientific theories is discussed, alongside the challenges of justifying scientific beliefs.
Publication Ethics: Ethical guidelines from organizations like COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and WAME (World Association of Medical Editors) are introduced, along with the risks of predatory publishing.
Journal Selection: The presentation highlights tools like journal suggesters (e.g., Springer, Elsevier) to help scholars find high-quality journals for their work.
Assignment Questions:
Discuss the concept of falsifiability in scientific research and its importance in establishing the validity of scientific theories.
What are the main ethical considerations in academic publishing, and how can researchers avoid falling prey to predatory journals?
Describe the process of selecting a journal for publication. What tools and strategies can a researcher use to find a reputable journal?
3. Digital Tools for Research and Researcher Profile
This presentation focuses on the modern tools available for research, including databases, reference management tools, and plagiarism prevention software. It also addresses the creation of a digital researcher profile on platforms like ORCID, Scopus, and Google Scholar to maintain an online academic presence.
Key Concepts:
Research Tools: Various tools for conducting qualitative and quantitative research are introduced, such as Zotero, Mendeley, and Turnitin. Databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Web of Science are discussed for accessing high-quality academic papers.
Researcher Metrics: The importance of metrics like the h-index, g-index, and journal impact factors is emphasized for evaluating research impact.
Digital Profile Management: Scholars are encouraged to create profiles on platforms such as ORCID, Scopus, and Google Scholar to interlink their research accounts and track citations.
Assignment Questions:
Discuss the role of digital tools in modern research and how they help streamline the research process.
How can a researcher effectively manage their digital academic profile, and why is it important for career development?
Compare different research metrics such as h-index and g-index. Which metric do you think is the most reflective of a scholar’s impact?
A Course on Research and Publication Ethics (RPE) - for Ph.D. Students
University Grants Commission (UGC) in its 543rd meeting held on 9th August 20-19 approved two Credit Course for awareness about publication ethics and publication misconducts entitled "Research and Publication Ethics (RPE)" to be made compulsory for all PhD students for pre-registration coursework.Click here to download the syllabus.
In view of the above, many PhD scholars as well as resource persons may be in need of the recommended books to carry out this coursework. All these resources are in public domain and can be downloaded from below given links:
Power, Fear, and Control: The Politics of Manufactured Threats
Arnab Goswami on US Deep State Conspiracy Theory
Palki Sharma on US Plot to topple India's Government
The use of fear and external threats by those in power to maintain their dominance is an age-old strategy employed by many authoritarian rulers throughout history. This tactic serves to divert the public’s attention away from the ruler’s true intentions and the reality of their governance, ensuring that the masses remain subservient and unchallenging. Such leaders often manufacture or exaggerate fears, whether they be internal dissent or external dangers, to keep the populace in a constant state of anxiety. This fear mongering makes the people reliant on the ruler, viewing them as the only safeguard against the perceived threats. The true character of the ruler, the corruption, and the actual issues plaguing society—such as poverty, inequality, and oppression—are overshadowed by the artificially created fear.
One of the most prominent examples of this strategy in modern history is the Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in India from 1975 to 1977. This period is often cited as one of the darkest chapters in Indian democracy, where civil liberties were suspended, political opponents were jailed, and the press was heavily censored. Indira Gandhi justified the Emergency by citing threats to the nation’s security, both from within and outside its borders. She claimed that internal disturbances, largely driven by opposition parties and their protests, had reached a level that threatened the very existence of the nation. To further solidify her position, there were assertions that international forces, particularly the United States and its intelligence agencies like the CIA, were involved in destabilizing India.
The idea that America was conspiring against India was not entirely unfounded in the context of the Cold War, where India’s non-aligned stance and its close relations with the Soviet Union often put it at odds with Western powers. However, the narrative of an imminent American threat was also a convenient tool for Indira Gandhi to suppress dissent and consolidate her power. By projecting an external threat, she was able to justify draconian measures that would otherwise have been unacceptable in a democratic society. The real motive, as many historians and political analysts argue, was to protect her political career in the wake of a court ruling that invalidated her 1971 election due to electoral malpractices. The fear of losing power and the rise of a strong opposition movement led her to impose the Emergency, using the pretext of national security to quell any opposition.
Similarly, in Bangladesh, the political landscape has often been shaped by the narrative of external threats, particularly involving the United States. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s tenure has seen various allegations and conspiracy theories suggesting that the United States, through its agencies like the CIA, has been involved in attempts to destabilize her government. These theories often emerge in the context of Bangladesh’s strategic importance in South Asia, its relationship with India, and its complex interactions with global powers. The notion that Western powers are conspiring to influence the politics of smaller nations is a recurring theme in global geopolitics, and in the case of Bangladesh, it serves as a way to rally nationalistic sentiments and discredit political opposition.
Sheikh Hasina, like Indira Gandhi, has been accused of using the specter of external threats to justify authoritarian measures. Critics argue that by portraying herself as a protector of national sovereignty against foreign conspiracies, she has been able to legitimize actions that undermine democratic processes. This includes the suppression of political rivals, restrictions on the media, and the use of state machinery to maintain her grip on power. The narrative of foreign interference allows her to cast any opposition as unpatriotic or as agents of external powers, thereby diminishing their credibility in the eyes of the public.
In a similar vein, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India has also brought up concerns about foreign interference in Indian elections. Recently, Modi claimed that there are attempts by "foreign powers" to influence India's elections, suggesting that these external forces are not merely offering opinions but are actively trying to meddle in India's electoral process. His remarks echo a familiar pattern where external threats are used to rally domestic support and discredit critics. Modi's statements have been supported by India's External Affairs Minister, Dr. S. Jaishankar, who pointed to the Western media as being part of this alleged interference. Jaishankar argued that the criticism coming from Western press outlets is not due to a lack of information but because these media entities see themselves as political players in India's elections.
This narrative is further complicated by the ongoing geopolitical tensions and the role of Western nations in commenting on or interfering with the internal politics of other countries. For instance, Western media has often been critical of Modi's policies, particularly regarding India's treatment of its Muslim population and the erosion of civil liberties under his leadership. Such criticism, especially during election periods, is seen by Modi's government as an attempt to influence public opinion and the election outcome. The government's response to these criticisms is to portray them as part of a broader conspiracy by foreign powers to undermine India's democracy, thereby justifying stricter controls and rallying nationalist sentiments.
Adding another layer to this narrative are reports of U.S. diplomats meeting with key Indian opposition leaders and activists, a development that has raised further suspicions about foreign interference in India's domestic affairs. For instance, ahead of the Assembly Elections in Jammu and Kashmir, U.S. diplomats, including Minister-Counsellor for Political Affairs Graham Mayer and First Secretary Gary Applegarth, met with National Conference Vice President Omar Abdullah at his residence in Srinagar. During this meeting, they reportedly discussed a wide range of issues related to Jammu and Kashmir. Similar meetings have also taken place with other Indian political figures, such as AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi. These diplomatic engagements, especially in the context of ongoing political tensions in regions like Jammu and Kashmir, have been perceived by some as attempts by the United States to exert influence over India’s internal matters.
Arnab Goswami, in his debate, delves into the covert operations allegedly conducted by U.S. diplomats in South Asia. He raises serious questions about whether there is a hidden agenda behind these diplomatic meetings, particularly in light of the timing—occurring just as critical elections are approaching. Goswami's analysis suggests that these actions could be part of a broader strategy by the United States to influence political outcomes in South Asia, echoing concerns that have been voiced by Indian leaders like Modi. These developments align with a pattern of Western interference that has been observed in other parts of the world, where diplomatic engagements are often followed by significant political shifts, sometimes in favor of Western interests.
These allegations are not entirely without precedent, as the global landscape is rife with accusations of foreign meddling in domestic affairs. Countries like the United States have long accused other nations, particularly Russia and China, of interfering in their elections. Similarly, Canada has accused both India and China of meddling in its political processes. The Western media's portrayal of Modi and his government can be seen as part of this larger pattern of international interference, where powerful nations attempt to influence the political outcomes in other countries to serve their strategic interests.
However, as Palki Sharma points out in her analysis, while these allegations of foreign interference are serious, they also need to be substantiated with clear evidence. Without concrete proof, such claims can easily be dismissed as mere political rhetoric aimed at discrediting opponents or justifying authoritarian measures. In India's case, the government has not provided specific evidence of foreign meddling, making it difficult to ascertain the veracity of these claims. Nonetheless, the narrative of foreign interference serves to bolster the government's position by framing it as a defender of national sovereignty against external threats.
The use of conspiracy theories and fear of external threats is not limited to these two examples. It is a common strategy used by authoritarian regimes around the world. Leaders in countries like Russia, North Korea, and even Turkey have often invoked the threat of foreign intervention or conspiracies to justify repressive measures. Vladimir Putin’s Russia, for instance, frequently cites the danger posed by NATO and Western intelligence agencies to justify crackdowns on political dissent and the suppression of civil liberties. In North Korea, the regime constantly portrays itself as being under siege from hostile foreign forces, particularly the United States, to maintain strict control over its population. In Turkey, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has used the failed coup attempt in 2016 as a pretext to purge political opponents, restrict the media, and centralize power, all while claiming to protect the nation from foreign-backed subversion.
This strategy is effective because it taps into a basic human instinct—the need for security. When people feel threatened, they are more likely to support strong, decisive leadership, even at the cost of their own freedoms. By creating a sense of fear, rulers can justify their actions as necessary for the protection of the nation, turning any criticism of their policies into a challenge to national security. This not only silences opposition but also unites the populace under the leader’s banner, making it difficult for any alternative voices to gain traction.
In conclusion, the use of fear and the narrative of external threats as tools of political control is a deeply ingrained tactic in the playbook of authoritarian leaders. Whether it is Indira Gandhi’s Emergency in India, Sheikh Hasina’s political maneuvers in Bangladesh, or similar actions by other leaders around the world, the goal remains the same—to maintain power by keeping the population in a state of fear and dependence. This strategy not only undermines democratic institutions and civil liberties but also perpetuates a cycle of repression and mistrust that can have long-lasting consequences for a nation’s political and social fabric. The challenge for any society facing such tactics is to remain vigilant, questioning the narratives being presented and recognizing when fear is being used as a tool of manipulation rather than as a genuine concern for national security.
अरनब गोस्वामी रिपब्लिक टीवी के इस वीडियो _ विचार को इस तरह समझे _______
शासक, खासकर निरंकुश या तानाशाह, जनता पर अपनी सत्ता बनाए रखने के लिए उन्हें डर में रखते हैं। यह एक प्राचीन रणनीति है जिसे कई तानाशाहों ने अपनाया है।
ऐसे शासक अक्सर किसी बाहरी या आंतरिक खतरे का डर दिखाकर जनता को नियंत्रित करते हैं। वे इस डर को प्रचारित करते हैं, ताकि जनता उनकी सत्ता को एकमात्र सुरक्षा का साधन समझे और विरोध करने की बजाय उनकी शरण में रहे।
इस प्रक्रिया में, जनता का ध्यान वास्तविक मुद्दों से हट जाता है। जैसे गरीबी, भ्रष्टाचार, या अन्य सामाजिक और आर्थिक समस्याएं। लोग शासक की वास्तविक मंशाओं को समझने की बजाय दिखाए गए डर से प्रभावित होते हैं।
तानाशाहों का मुख्य उद्देश्य यह होता है कि लोग उनके असली चरित्र या उनके गलत कार्यों को न समझ पाएं। भय के माहौल में लोग सोचने और सवाल उठाने की शक्ति खो देते हैं, और इस तरह शासक अपनी सत्ता को कायम रखता है।
ऐतिहासिक दृष्टि से, हिटलर जैसे कई तानाशाहों ने इस रणनीति का उपयोग किया है, जहां उन्होंने अपने विरोधियों या एक खास समूह को जनता के लिए खतरे के रूप में पेश किया और इसी बहाने अपने कठोर नियमों और अत्याचारों को जायज ठहराया।
अतः यह एक रणनीति है जिसमें शासक जनता को भयभीत करके, उनकी स्वतंत्रता और सोचने की क्षमता को दबाकर अपनी सत्ता को लंबी अवधि तक कायम रखने का प्रयास करता है।
अरनब गोस्वामी के वीडियो की बाते नई नही है। इंदिरा गांधी द्वारा भारत में लगाई गई इमरजेंसी और शेख हसीना को देश छोड़ने के पीछे अमेरिका की डीप स्टेट (जैसे सीआईए, एफबीआई) से संबंधित षड्यंत्र सिद्धांतों का जिक्र किया जाता है। इन घटनाओं में शासकों ने अपनी सत्ता को बनाए रखने या अपने विरोधियों को दबाने के लिए अंतर्राष्ट्रीय खतरे का इस्तेमाल किया।
इंदिरा गांधी और इमरजेंसी (1975-1977)
इंदिरा गांधी ने 1975 में इमरजेंसी लागू की, जो भारतीय लोकतंत्र के इतिहास में एक विवादास्पद घटना मानी जाती है। इमरजेंसी के दौरान इंदिरा गांधी ने संसद और नागरिक अधिकारों पर नियंत्रण कर लिया। इंदिरा गांधी ने इमरजेंसी लगाने के पीछे विभिन्न कारण बताए, जिनमें देश में आंतरिक गड़बड़ी और बाहरी खतरे की संभावना शामिल थी।
इमरजेंसी का औचित्य साबित करने के लिए, इंदिरा गांधी और उनके सहयोगियों ने दावा किया कि भारत के खिलाफ एक अंतर्राष्ट्रीय षड्यंत्र चल रहा है, विशेष रूप से अमेरिका द्वारा। यह कहा गया कि अमेरिका और उसकी एजेंसियां, जैसे सीआईए, भारत में अस्थिरता फैलाने और सरकार को कमजोर करने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं। इस प्रकार, इंदिरा गांधी ने इमरजेंसी को देश की सुरक्षा के लिए आवश्यक कदम के रूप में प्रस्तुत किया।
लेकिन कई विद्वानों और आलोचकों का मानना है कि इमरजेंसी का असली उद्देश्य इंदिरा गांधी की राजनीतिक सत्ता को बनाए रखना और विरोधी दलों को कुचलना था। इस दौरान हजारों राजनीतिक कार्यकर्ताओं और पत्रकारों को गिरफ्तार किया गया, प्रेस पर सेंसरशिप लागू की गई, और नागरिक स्वतंत्रताओं को सीमित कर दिया गया।
शेख हसीना और अमेरिका का प्रभाव
शेख हसीना के संदर्भ में भी अमेरिका और उसकी एजेंसियों का उल्लेख किया जाता है। बांग्लादेश की राजनीति में अमेरिका का प्रभाव अक्सर चर्चा का विषय रहा है। शेख हसीना की सरकार पर भी कई बार आरोप लगे कि उन्हें सत्ता से हटाने या उनके खिलाफ षड्यंत्र रचने में अमेरिका की भूमिका हो सकती है।
इन षड्यंत्र सिद्धांतों के अनुसार, अमेरिका और उसकी एजेंसियां जैसे सीआईए, बांग्लादेश की राजनीति में हस्तक्षेप करने और शेख हसीना को कमजोर करने की कोशिश कर सकती हैं, खासकर जब उनकी नीतियां अमेरिका के हितों के खिलाफ जाती हैं।
निष्कर्ष
इन दोनों उदाहरणों में, शासकों ने अपनी सत्ता बनाए रखने के लिए अंतर्राष्ट्रीय षड्यंत्र सिद्धांतों का इस्तेमाल किया। इंदिरा गांधी ने इमरजेंसी लगाने के पीछे अमेरिका से खतरा बताया, जबकि शेख हसीना के मामले में भी अमेरिका की भूमिका के बारे में षड्यंत्र सिद्धांत चलाए जाते हैं।
इस तरह की रणनीतियों का उद्देश्य जनता को डर में रखना और अपने राजनीतिक विरोधियों को कमजोर करना होता है। जनता के सामने बाहरी खतरे का डर दिखाकर शासक अपनी सत्ता को मजबूत करने की कोशिश करते हैं, जिससे जनता उनके असली मकसद को न समझ सके और उनकी सत्ता बनी रहे।
Reimagining Resistance: The Appropriation of Tribal
Heroes in Rajamouli's RRR
This pre-print explores the reimagining of tribal heroes Alluri Sitarama
Raju and Komaram Bheem in S.S. Rajamouli's film RRR. The film
appropriates these historical figures, known for their resistance against local
forms of oppression, and reframes them as nationalistic symbols in the fight
against British colonialism. While RRR succeeds in creating a compelling
narrative of unity and resistance, it overlooks the specific struggles for
land, water, and forest rights that defined Raju’s and Bheem’s legacies. By
focusing on a broader nationalist agenda, the film misses the opportunity to
address contemporary issues of displacement and environmental degradation that
continue to affect indigenous communities in India. This analysis critiques the
film's narrative choices, arguing that they dilute the historical significance
of these figures and their relevance to ongoing movements for environmental
justice and the rights of indigenous peoples.
The appropriation of Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem in S.S.
Rajamouli's RRR raises critical questions about the role of popular
cinema in representing historical figures and their struggles. Both Raju and
Bheem are remembered for their resistance against oppressive regimes—Raju for
his opposition to the British following the 1882 Madras Forest Act, which
curtailed the rights of Adivasis to their traditional forest habitats, and
Bheem for his struggle against the Nizam of Hyderabad, encapsulated in the
slogan "Jal, Jangal, Zameen" (Water, Forest, Land). Rajamouli’s film,
however, reimagines these figures as united freedom fighters against the
British Raj, shifting the focus from their specific, localized battles to a
broader nationalist narrative. While this makes for a compelling epic, it also
glosses over the urgent contemporary issues of climate change and displacement
that continue to affect tribal communities in India.
At the heart of both Raju's and Bheem's historical struggles were the
rights to land, water, and forests—resources that are still under threat today
due to industrialization, deforestation, and the expansion of corporate
interests. The displacement of indigenous people from their ancestral lands has
not only disrupted their way of life but also contributed significantly to
environmental degradation. In this context, Rajamouli’s choice to focus on the
fight against the British Raj rather than the ongoing struggles for
environmental justice represents a missed opportunity to address these critical
issues.
Displacement: A Broader Perspective
Displacement is often understood simply as the movement of people from
one place to another, but as writer Annie Zaidi poignantly describes in Known
Turf, it is a much more profound and devastating experience. Zaidi writes,
"Displacement… is a very inadequate word that conveys nothing of its true
meaning. Displacement is not about moving…(It) is about losing a river. Losing
access to clean, safe, drinking water…losing land that is watered richly…losing
the grass that your herds grazed on. Losing your cattle. Losing the milk that
came from your cattle…losing honey and herbs…losing the right to protest when
somebody in a uniform shows up to set fire to your home. What else was left to
lose?"
Zaidi’s description underscores the deep loss and disconnection that
come with displacement, particularly for indigenous communities. It’s not
merely about physical relocation but about the loss of a way of life, of
cultural and spiritual connections to the land, and of the basic resources
needed for survival. This is the kind of displacement that Alluri Sitarama Raju
and Komaram Bheem fought against, and it’s a displacement that continues to
this day, as corporate interests encroach upon the forests and rivers that
sustain tribal communities.
Climate Change and Environmental Justice
The connection between displacement and climate change is also critical.
Indigenous communities, who have traditionally lived in harmony with their
natural environments, are often the first to feel the impacts of environmental
degradation. As forests are cleared for development, not only do these
communities lose their homes and livelihoods, but the destruction of these
ecosystems also accelerates climate change. Deforestation contributes to the
increase in greenhouse gases, disrupts local climates, and reduces
biodiversity—all of which have far-reaching consequences for the planet.
Rajamouli’s decision to frame RRR as a nationalist epic, focusing
on the fight against the British Raj, sidesteps these urgent environmental
issues. By doing so, the film misses an opportunity to connect the historical
struggles of Raju and Bheem to contemporary movements for environmental
justice. A film that recontextualized their resistance as a fight for the
preservation of land, water, and forests—resources that are crucial not only
for the survival of indigenous communities but for the health of the
planet—could have had a significant impact on raising awareness about climate
change. . . .
Heroes or Hegemons? The Celluloid Empire of Rambo and Bond in America's Geopolitical Narrative
The Rambo and James Bond film franchises have often acted as powerful vehicles for promoting American geopolitical perspectives, especially during the Cold War and the subsequent era ofglobalization. Through these films, Hollywood has wielded significant soft power, shaping global perceptions of American values, ideology, and military might in ways that align with broader U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Rambo Franchise: From Vietnam to Afghanistan
Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) and Rambo III (1988) are the most explicit in advancing an American geopolitical narrative.
Rambo: First Blood Part II revisits the Vietnam War, portraying the United States as seeking redemption for its past humiliation, with the Vietnamese depicted as villains. The film suggests that American soldiers were betrayed by their own government but remained heroic, ultimately triumphing over communism.
Rambo III shifts the setting to Afghanistan, where John Rambo aids the Mujahideen against the Soviet Union. This narrative aligns closely with U.S. support for Afghan rebels during the Soviet-Afghan War, presenting the conflict as a moral crusade against communism and promoting the idea of America as a global liberator.
Rambo in Afghanistan
James Bond Franchise: Western Interests and Global Narratives
Although James Bond is a British creation, the series often aligns with broader Western geopolitical interests, particularly during the Cold War.
The Living Daylights (1987) features Bond assisting Afghan rebels, echoing the narrative of Rambo III. This alignment with Western support for the Mujahideen positions Bond as a defender of Western interests against Soviet expansion.
Licence to Kill (1989), while less overtly political, addresses Western concerns about drug cartels, indirectly supporting U.S. policies in the War on Drugs.
Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) explores themes of media manipulation and control of information, reflecting U.S. concerns about maintaining narrative dominance in the post-Cold War world.
Soft Power and the U.S. as an Empire
These films served as tools of soft power in several key ways:
Projecting Ideology: Both franchises reinforced the narrative of the United States (and the broader West) as defenders of freedom, democracy, and human rights, often positioning American (or allied) characters as the moral center of the story.
Cultural Hegemony: Through widespread global distribution, these films normalized American values and geopolitical perspectives, subtly influencing audiences worldwide and perpetuating a pro-Western worldview.
Economic Influence: The commercial success of these franchises showcased the appeal of American cultural products, helping to maintain U.S. dominance in global entertainment markets and reinforcing the economic aspect of American hegemony.
Global Perception: By depicting U.S. military and intelligence agencies as supremely competent and just, these films enhanced the perception of American power and legitimacy on the global stage.
In the era of globalization, the Rambo and James Bond franchises contributed significantly to the narrative of the United States as a benevolent global superpower, using entertainment to subtly align global audiences with American interests and worldview. Whether perceived as heroes or hegemons, these iconic characters and their stories have played a crucial role in crafting America's celluloid empire, influencing how the world sees U.S. power and purpose.
In this context, the legacy of franchises like Rambo and James Bond illustrates how Hollywood has historically positioned the United States as a benevolent global superpower, subtly aligning audiences with American interests and worldview. This mastery of soft power is precisely what Palki Sharma in the Gravitas Plus video highlights, as she calls for Bollywood to similarly project India's narrative on the global stage. However, while this suggestion acknowledges the effectiveness of Hollywood's strategies, it also raises a critical question: should other film industries, like Bollywood, simply replicate this hegemonic approach?
Palki Sharma in this Gravitas Plus:How India can harness the soft power of Bollywood video discusses how America effectively uses Hollywood as a tool of soft power to shape global perceptions and spread the "American Dream." The speaker, Palki Sharma, argues that India should leverage Bollywood similarly to project India's narrative and enhance its soft power. However, her critique focuses on an essential point that is often overlooked in such discussions: the dangers of mimicking hegemonic practices without critical reflection.
Her arguments suggest that while Hollywood’s influence is undeniable, its approach—often portraying America as the global hero—can reinforce a hegemonic narrative that marginalizes other perspectives. Encouraging Bollywood or any other film industry to adopt a similar approach risks perpetuating these hegemonic dynamics rather than challenging them.
Instead of pushing for Bollywood to replicate Hollywood's methods, the focus should be on critiquing and deconstructing these dominant narratives. Bollywood and other film industries have the potential to offer alternative perspectives, tell stories that challenge existing power structures, and provide a platform for voices that are often silenced or ignored in mainstream global cinema.
By critiquing and resisting hegemonic narratives, rather than mimicking them, film industries like Bollywood can play a significant role in fostering a more diverse and inclusive global discourse. This approach aligns with the idea that storytelling should not only reflect cultural identities but also question and challenge the status quo, offering new ways of seeing and understanding the world.
.jpeg)