5 Surprising Truths About Bouncing Back

 5 Surprising Truths About Bouncing Back: A Deep Dive into Human Resilience

Video recording of the session on which this blog is prepared

The presentation on this topic can be downloaded from: 

https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/human-resilience-the-art-of-bouncing-back/284889505

Introduction: The Hidden Strength We All Possess

When we hear the word "resilience," our minds often jump to images of toughness, grit, and an unshakeable strength. We think of courage, determination, and the ability to withstand immense pressure. This common understanding isn't wrong, but it's only a fraction of the story. It paints a picture of resilience as a rigid shield we hold up against the world.

A recent university webinar on the subject—delivered to an audience of engineering students, a group already familiar with solving complex problems—revealed that this view is surprisingly incomplete. The talk explored a set of profound, counter-intuitive principles for navigating life’s inevitable setbacks. It suggested that true resilience is less about being an immovable object and more about mastering a dynamic and adaptable internal art form.

This article shares the five most impactful and surprising takeaways from that discussion, reframing how we think about our ability to bounce back from adversity. These truths challenge the conventional wisdom about strength and offer a more practical roadmap for cultivating the capacity to not just survive challenges, but to grow from them.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. True Resilience Isn't About Being Rigid; It's About Being Like Water.

One of the most powerful ideas presented was that real strength lies in flexibility, not hardness. The speaker drew upon the "Be Like Water" philosophy, famously attributed to Bruce Lee, to illustrate this point. Water is powerful enough to destroy concrete dams, yet it is also adaptable enough to take the shape of any container it is poured into, whether a cup, a bottle, or a teapot.

This is a surprising take on strength because we often associate resilience with being rock-solid and unyielding. The common image is of a person who stands firm and refuses to bend. But this philosophy suggests the opposite: true strength is fluid and formless. This philosophy is especially relevant today, as we are constantly required to adapt to new technologies, new ways of working, and unexpected global shifts—a challenge the speaker noted we are all currently facing. It’s the ability to adjust to your environment, to find a way around or through an obstacle without shattering. Rigidity is what breaks; adaptability is what endures.

"empty your mind be formless shapeless like water if you put water into a cup it becomes the cup if you if you put water into a bottle it becomes a bottle if you you put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot water can flow anywhere be water"

2. Resilience Is Your 'Black Box'—You Only Open It After a Crash.

The speaker offered a striking metaphor to explain the role of resilience in our lives, comparing it to an aeroplane's flight recorder, or "black box." This device is a crucial part of any aircraft, constantly recording flight data and cockpit conversations, but it is never opened or listened to during a normal, uneventful flight.

The black box is only searched for and analyzed after a crash. Its purpose is to help investigators understand what went wrong. Similarly, our resilience is a core part of who we are—a capacity we must constantly maintain—but its true function is revealed only during life's "crashes." These are the moments of extreme adversity, such as a serious illness, a major professional failure, or the devastating loss of a loved one. It is in these moments that we "open the box" to understand what we're made of and how to move forward.

This metaphor highlights the importance of nurturing our resilience before a crisis hits. The speaker suggested a comprehensive framework for this maintenance, a pyramid built on "5 Ps" (Passion, Persistence, Perseverance, Practice, Positive Attitude), "3 Es" (Education, Environment, Experience), "2 Ss" (Sports, Spirituality), and at the very top, "1 G" (the "Greatest of all those kinds of things," like courage, fortitude, and tenacity).

3. Sometimes, the Ultimate Test of Resilience Is Defying the Majority.

While many athletes display resilience in their sport, the speaker singled out Muhammad Ali as "the greatest" for a different reason—one that transcended the boxing ring. His story demonstrates that resilience isn't just about recovering from personal setbacks; it can also be about standing firm in one's principles against overwhelming external pressure.

During the prime of his athletic career, when he was the world boxing champion, Ali resisted the U.S. government's call to fight in the Vietnam War. As a result, he faced an official government ban that prevented him from participating in boxing—a devastating blow during the critical, fleeting years of a professional athlete's career. He refused to bow down to the immense pressure from the government and the majority public opinion of the time.

This example shows that resilience isn't always about bouncing back. Sometimes, it’s about having the fortitude to not back down in the first place, even when it means fighting powerful authorities and challenging popular belief. It is the courage to stand for a truth that may not be recognized until years later.

4. The Most Extreme Setbacks Can Fuel the Greatest Triumphs.

One of the most profound truths about resilience is that our deepest wounds can become the source of our greatest strengths. The story of Arunima Sinha, as told in the webinar, is a stunning testament to this principle.

Sinha was a national volleyball player in India, traveling on a train when she was attacked by robbers. They threw her from the moving train, and she landed on a parallel track. Lying there, half-conscious, she could not move her leg as another train approached. It ran over her leg, which had to be amputated. As she lay injured on the tracks, with trains passing by, she resolved, "I'm not going to die." She was rushed to the hospital where, in a further testament to human connection, the doctor gave his own blood to save her.

What happened next is extraordinary. After surviving this unimaginable trauma, Sinha, now with an artificial limb, set a new goal. She went on to become the first female amputee in the world to conquer Mount Everest. She didn't stop there, proceeding to climb the other highest peaks on every continent. The speaker urged the audience not just to hear these stories, but to research them, to write about them, and to make them a personal source of inspiration. Her life is a powerful lesson: the most extreme and unthinkable setbacks can become the very foundation for unparalleled achievements.

5. A Powerful Strategy for Building Resilience Is to Visualize Failure.

In a world saturated with the "power of positive thinking," one of the most counter-intuitive takeaways came from the webinar's Q&A session. When asked about preparing for adversity, the speaker advised a strategy that runs contrary to popular self-help narratives.

Instead of focusing only on success, he recommended always visualizing what will happen if you fail. His advice is not about being pessimistic, but about what he calls an ability to "positively look at negativity." This practice forces you to think through the consequences and, crucially, to create a Plan B, Plan C, and even a Plan D. This mental preparation makes you far more robust and truly resilient when things inevitably go wrong.

He applied this personally while preparing for the webinar itself, which was threatened by the forecast of a severe cyclone. By anticipating a total failure of electricity and internet, he arranged for a hotel room with a private generator and a backup internet connection. The show would go on, no matter what. This proactive approach to potential failure is a cornerstone of practical resilience.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: Are You Ready for What Comes Next?

True resilience is a complex and multifaceted skill. As these principles show, it is far more than simple toughness. It is the adaptability of water, the quiet readiness of a black box, the moral courage to defy the crowd, and the strategic wisdom to prepare for failure. For a generation being trained to build the future, these lessons are not just inspiring; they are essential design principles for a well-lived life.

It’s not a question of if a setback will happen, but when. What is one thing you can do today to start maintaining your own "black box"?

5 Surprising Truths for the Modern PhD Researcher

 Beyond the Books: 5 Surprising Truths for the Modern PhD Researcher

Embarking on a PhD is an exhilarating journey, a commitment to diving deeper into a subject than ever before. But for today’s researchers, the path is not just through quiet libraries and laboratories; it’s a sprawling digital maze, flooded with an unprecedented amount of information, tools, and platforms. The sheer volume can be as overwhelming as it is empowering.

Success in this modern landscape requires more than just rigorous academic thinking. It demands a new kind of literacy—a digital savvy that allows you to navigate the noise, harness technology effectively, and build a presence in a global, interconnected academic community. This isn't about replacing traditional scholarship but augmenting it with a critical, strategic, and digitally-aware mindset.

The following five points are essential, and often surprising, takeaways from a recent workshop for new research scholars. They represent fundamental shifts in how a successful research career is built in the digital age.

1. The Great Tech Paradox: We Were Promised Less Work, Not More.

Digital tools entered the academic world with a clear promise: they would save us time, reduce our workload, improve the accuracy of our findings, and safeguard academic integrity. For a new researcher, this sounds like a perfect support system. However, the reality has proven to be far more complex.

Instead of reducing our workload, technology has often increased it through the demands of constant multitasking. Rather than guaranteeing accuracy, the digital world has introduced new threats, from the rise of predatory journals and clone websites to the challenge of discerning fact from fiction in AI-generated content. Academic integrity, too, faces new pressures in this environment.

This paradox doesn't mean we should retreat from technology. On the contrary, it means we must engage with it more critically and intelligently than ever before. The core challenge lies in managing the sheer scale of information now available.

The exponential growth of information poses a significant challenge due to human limitations in processing and managing such vast datasets.

2. You're Probably a Digital Ghost (And That's a Huge Problem).

Here is a shocking, but true, statistic from a pre-session survey of approximately 150 new PhD scholars: only four of them had an ORCID iD, and only nine had a Google Scholar profile. The speaker at the workshop noted that for anyone serious about a research career, both of those figures should be 100%.

What does this mean? It means the vast majority of emerging researchers are effectively invisible in the digital spaces where modern scholarship is discovered, shared, and evaluated. In an era where funding bodies, collaborators, and institutions search for researchers online, being a "digital ghost" is a critical liability.

If you don't have a professional digital footprint, you miss out on visibility for your work, opportunities for networking and collaboration, and the ability to properly track and receive credit for your academic contributions. The good news is that this is one of the easiest and most important problems to fix, starting today.

3. Get Your Digital "Passport": Why an ORCID iD is Non-Negotiable.

Many new scholars mistake an ORCID iD for just another social media profile to manage. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of its purpose. The most powerful analogy is to think of it as an "Aadhaar card" or a digital passport for a researcher—a unique, persistent digital identifier that is yours for your entire career.

Its core function is to solve a simple but massive problem: name ambiguity. An ORCID iD distinguishes you from every other researcher with a similar name, ensuring that all of your academic activities—publications, datasets, peer reviews—are correctly and automatically linked to you. This identifier works seamlessly across major academic platforms like Scopus and Web of Science. Without it, your growing body of work remains fragmented, making it difficult for tenure committees, grant reviewers, and potential collaborators to see the full scope of your impact.

In an age of big data, machine learning, and AI, where automated systems are increasingly used to track academic output and impact, having this unique marker is not just helpful; it is essential for ensuring your work is accurately attributed to you.

4. AI Isn't Plagiarism. But Here's the Catch.

The rise of generative AI has created considerable confusion around academic ethics. It is crucial to understand the fundamental difference between using an AI tool and committing plagiarism.

• Plagiarism is theft. It is the act of copying someone else's existing work or ideas and presenting them as your own without giving credit.

• AI generation is creation. An AI tool generates new text based on the patterns it has learned from vast amounts of data. It is not copying from a single, specific source.

• Plagiarism is academic dishonesty. In contrast, using AI can be a legitimate aid for tasks like exploring ideas, improving language and grammar, or summarizing complex information.

Here is the essential catch: while AI isn't plagiarism, the ethical responsibility for its use rests entirely on you, the researcher. You must use AI critically, verify the accuracy of its output, provide proper acknowledgment or citation according to publisher guidelines, and ensure that the final work is your own original contribution. The distinction is clear: Plagiarism = Theft | AI = Tool.

5. The First Step to Writing Your Paper? Stop Writing.

A common mistake among new researchers is to write their entire manuscript and only then begin the search for a suitable journal. This approach is often inefficient and can lead to a series of rejections based on a mismatch between the paper and the journal's scope or audience.

A more effective and strategic approach is the "Journal First" method, grounded in the publishing steps outlined by major publishers like Taylor & Francis. This strategy posits that the very first step in the publishing process—even before you start writing the manuscript—should be selecting your target journal.

Why? Because choosing your journal first allows you to tailor your work from the ground up. You can align the manuscript's style, structure, scope, tone, and even the specific research "conversation" it's joining to the journal's specific requirements and audience. This proactive step saves you from the demoralizing cycle of writing, submitting, and facing rejections for reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of your research and everything to do with poor targeting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: From Scholar to Digital Scholar

Succeeding in a modern PhD program requires an evolution in mindset. The journey is no longer just about becoming a scholar in your field; it's about becoming a digital scholar. This means integrating astute digital practices with the timeless principles of rigorous intellectual inquiry.

The takeaways discussed here are not merely optional tips; they are fundamental adjustments to how you should approach your research career. Building a robust digital profile, using technology critically and ethically, and strategizing your publishing are now core competencies for academic success.

As you move forward in your research, which one of these digital-era habits will you commit to building first?

Birth of Modern Mind

 The Making of the Modern Mind - From Victorian Certainty to Modernist Fragmentation

A persistent belief haunts the humanities—that studying English Literature is a romantic detour, intellectually charming but professionally impractical. In a time that idolizes technology, employability, and career-focused degrees, literature often gets dismissed as “timepass,” a leisurely drift into irrelevance, if not a deliberate plunge into uncertainty.

Yet this view misunderstands the true nature of literary study. Far from being an escape into old books, literature is one of the most rigorous, dynamic, and urgently needed disciplines of the modern age. Its methods sharpen the mind, its insights deepen our humanity, and its relevance grows stronger as the world becomes more complex, digitally saturated, and ideologically fractured. When approached seriously, literature becomes nothing less than a training ground for living wisely and well.

• To read more, click here:  

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398410276_The_Making_of_the_Modern_Mind

• To check your understanding, appear in this online quiz: https://forms.gle/wZaGYSmAYuYuUfL4A 
• Watch this short video based on this lecture note: https://youtu.be/0V-owjYTJ2g

• Listen this audio podcase based on this lecture note: https://youtu.be/IHQ2_3mfU0E 

 Short-Answer Questions

Provide a 2-3 sentence answer for each question.

1. Explain the primary contribution of Ernst Mach to the epistemological crisis of the modern age.

2. How did Charles Darwin’s work reorient the understanding of human existence?

3. Describe the core idea behind Karl Marx’s concept of class struggle.

4. What did Friedrich Nietzsche mean by "slave morality," and what did he propose in its place?

5. What was the impact of World War I on the "Lost Generation" and their faith in Western progress?

6. According to the text, how did Albert Einstein's theory of relativity metaphorically shape modernist literature?

7. What is "anomie" as described by Émile Durkheim?

8. Briefly summarize two key differences between the Victorian and Modernist worldviews.

9. Identify two modernist writers influenced by Sigmund Freud and explain what themes his work introduced into their literature.

10. In what way did Karl Marx's ideas reshape literary criticism itself?

Answer Key

Short-Answer Answers

1. Ernst Mach contributed to the epistemological crisis by asserting that only sensory experience is real and rejecting metaphysics. This undermined the Victorian confidence in a stable, objective reality and led to literary techniques like fragmentation and perspectivism.

2. Darwin's work reoriented human self-understanding by undermining the Biblical creation story and repositioning humans as evolved animals. This introduced randomness into the meaning of life and removed the certainty of divine purpose.

3. Karl Marx's concept of class struggle posits that history is a record of conflict between social classes, particularly the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He argued that this economic conflict shapes all other aspects of society, including culture, politics, and morality.

4. Nietzsche described Christian values as a "slave morality" created by the weak to control the strong. He proposed that it be replaced by new, life-affirming values created by the strong individual, the Übermensch.

5. World War I shattered the "Lost Generation's" faith in Western progress and rationality by demonstrating that technology could be a tool for mass murder. This led to widespread disillusionment, cynicism, and trauma, which became central themes in their literature.

6. Einstein's theory of relativity destabilized the Newtonian idea of absolute time and space. This scientific rupture served as a powerful metaphor for modernist writers, who began to experiment with fractured timelines, subjective perceptions of time, and ruptured narrative structures.

7. "Anomie," as described by Émile Durkheim, refers to social fragmentation and the collapse of collective consciousness. It explains the loss of social bonds and the sense of modern isolation and loneliness.

8. The Victorian worldview was characterized by moral certainty, faith in progress, and stable social hierarchies. In contrast, the Modernist worldview was defined by a crisis of values, disillusionment, fragmentation, and existential anxiety.

9. The text lists Joyce and Woolf as writers influenced by Freud. His work introduced themes of guilt, repression, sexuality, and neurosis, and inspired literary techniques like stream of consciousness to explore the inner, irrational lives of characters.

10. Karl Marx's ideas provided a new lens to examine the social world, focusing on ideology, class relations, and capitalist modernity. This reshaped literary criticism by encouraging analysis of how economic and social forces are reflected and critiqued in literature.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essay Questions

1. Analyze how the combined intellectual contributions of Darwin, Marx, and Freud systematically dismantled the core pillars of the Victorian worldview (religion, social order, and rationality).

2. Discuss the role of World War I as the ultimate catalyst for Modernism. How did this "psychic catastrophe" translate the philosophical and psychological crises of the late 19th century into a lived, collective experience, and how is this reflected in modernist literature?

3. Friedrich Nietzsche is described as "central to the psychological and moral breakdown of late modernity." Elaborate on this statement, explaining how his key ideas (the death of God, will to power, Übermensch) contributed to themes of nihilism, fragmentation, and the rise of the anti-hero in literature.

4. Compare and contrast the Victorian and Modernist literary sensibilities. Use the provided characteristics (e.g., certainty vs. crisis, order vs. fragmentation, realism vs. experimentation) to explain why modernist literature looks and feels fundamentally different from its predecessor.

5. Explain how the scientific and sociological ideas of thinkers like Mach, Einstein, Weber, and Durkheim contributed to a sense of instability, disenchantment, and alienation that became characteristic of the modern condition and, consequently, modern literature.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Glossary of Key Terms

Term	Definition
Alienation	A state of estrangement or disconnection, particularly as described by Marx, from one's work, society, and self under capitalism.
Anomie	A concept from Émile Durkheim describing a condition of social fragmentation, the collapse of collective consciousness, and a loss of social bonds leading to modern isolation.
Biological Determinism	The idea that human behavior and destiny are primarily determined by genetic and biological factors; a concept that gained prominence after Darwin.
Class Struggle	The central concept in Karl Marx's theory that history is a record of conflict between opposing social classes, driven by economic forces.
Disenchantment	A concept from Max Weber describing the process by which modernity, through rationalization and bureaucracy, strips the world of its mystery, magic, and traditional meanings.
Duration	Henri Bergson's concept of time as a subjective, fluid, and qualitative experience (lived time) as opposed to the objective, quantitative, and spatialized time measured by clocks.
Empirio-Criticism	The philosophy of Ernst Mach which states that only sensory experience is real, thereby rejecting metaphysics and undermining the idea of a stable, objective reality.
Epistemological Crisis	A crisis of knowledge and certainty. In the modern context, it refers to the breakdown of confidence in objective reality and stable truth, influenced by thinkers like Mach.
Existentialism	A philosophical movement concerned with human existence, freedom, and responsibility in a meaningless universe. Its roots can be seen in Kierkegaard and its themes in the work of Nietzsche.
Historical Materialism	Karl Marx's theory that the economic base (the mode of production) is the foundation of society and shapes its superstructure (culture, politics, religion, morality).
Interior Monologue	A literary technique that presents a character's inner thoughts and feelings directly, often in a continuous flow, closely related to stream of consciousness.
Iron Cage	Max Weber's metaphor for the condition of modern individuals being trapped in systems of efficiency, rational calculation, and bureaucratic control.
Logical Positivism	A philosophical movement, influenced by Ernst Mach and developed by the Vienna Circle, that prioritizes verification, observation, and empirical data, and rejects metaphysics.
Lost Generation	The generation of young people who came of age during World War I, characterized by their profound disillusionment, cynicism, and trauma.
Modernism	A cultural and literary movement (c. 1890–1945) characterized by a rejection of Victorian traditions and an embrace of experimentation, fragmentation, subjectivity, and themes of alienation, anxiety, and a crisis of meaning.
Naturalism	A literary movement that grew out of realism, emphasizing the influence of heredity and environment (biological and social determinism) on human character.
Nihilism	The philosophical belief that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value; a consequence of Nietzsche's "death of God."
Psychoanalysis	Sigmund Freud's theory of mind and therapeutic practice, which posits that human behavior is driven by the unconscious, including repressed desires, traumas, and sexual drives (libido).
Rationalization	Max Weber's term for the historical process by which modern society becomes increasingly dominated by rules, efficiency, and logical calculation, leading to disenchantment.
Relativity	Albert Einstein's theory which destabilized the classical notion of absolute time and space, serving as a metaphor for the subjective and fragmented nature of reality in Modernism.
Stream of Consciousness	A literary style in which a character's thoughts, feelings, and reactions are depicted in a continuous, uninterrupted flow, mirroring the chaotic nature of the human mind.
Übermensch	Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of the "overman" or "superman," a model for the self-creating, life-affirming modern individual who moves beyond traditional morality to create new values.
Victorianism	The cultural, social, and moral ethos of the reign of Queen Victoria (1837–1901), characterized by moral certainty, faith in progress, stable social hierarchies, optimism, and religious belief.
Will to Power	In Nietzsche's philosophy, the fundamental drive present in all things to expand their power, strive, grow, and dominate; it is the engine of creativity and self-creation.