Should Ministers in Office Endorse Private Products or Services?
Should Prime Minister Narendra Modi demand an apology from Reliance Jio for featuring his photograph in their launch advertisement? But more importantly, should he demand an apology?
 |
| Image 1: Font page newspaper ad with PM's photo |
Image 1: PM Modi in Reliance Jio’s Advertisement
Reliance Jio placed a full-page front-cover advertisement in leading national newspapers featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s photograph, creating the impression that he is endorsing the product.
While this may not be inherently problematic, it raises an important question: Should the Prime Minister be held accountable for products or services that are implicitly endorsed using his image or quotes?
This debate gains relevance as discussions continue around holding brand ambassadors accountable for the products they endorse. A similar issue was highlighted during the controversy surrounding the Maggi ban, where cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni faced scrutiny for his endorsement of the brand.
Now, as many parliamentarians advocate for making celebrities legally liable for the products they promote, should we not also question whether ministers in key decision-making positions should object to private companies using their quotes or photographs in advertisements? If they do not object, does their silence imply consent? And if so, should they also be held accountable?
 |
| Image 2 |
Image 2: The 2003 Pepsi-Coca-Cola Controversy
This situation is reminiscent of 2003 when Coca-Cola and Pepsi faced allegations of containing pesticides in their beverages, triggering nationwide outrage.
A report from The Times of India dated August 3, 2003, shows that the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led government was under immense pressure. Following extensive testing in national and international laboratories, then-Health and Family Welfare Minister Sushma Swaraj addressed Parliament on August 21, 2003, stating that Pepsi and Coca-Cola were "well within the safety limits."
 |
| Image 3: Minister quoted in Pepsi Ad |
Image 3: Pepsi’s Advertisement Featuring a Minister’s Statement
The very next day, on August 22, 2003, Pepsi strategically used the minister’s statement in a half-page newspaper advertisement. The ad directly quoted the Health Minister, suggesting that her remarks restored and reinforced public confidence in their product.
However, this did not sit well with Minister Swaraj, who objected to the use of her statement in a corporate advertisement. Her objection may have been rooted in personal ethics, or she may have felt that it was inappropriate for a private company to leverage a minister’s words for commercial gain. This case remains a significant precedent, serving as a cautionary example in discussions about ministerial endorsement of private products and services.
Following her objection, Pepsi issued another advertisement in the same newspapers apologizing for the misuse of her statement. (See Image 4.)
Will PM Modi Take Similar Action?
Can we expect a similar response from Prime Minister Modi? Will the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) demand an apology from Reliance Jio for using his photograph in their advertisement?
 |
| Image 4: Minister's Objection. |
Why Is This Controversial?
One of the reasons this issue has sparked controversy is Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s perceived relationship with Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani.
A widely circulated photograph shows Mukesh Ambani placing his hand on the Prime Minister’s shoulder while PM Modi holds the hand of Nita Ambani (Mukesh Ambani’s wife) along with Mukesh Ambani. While hand-holding itself is not the issue, the way Mukesh Ambani places his hand in a gesture of "support" toward the PM has drawn significant public and media scrutiny.
These factors contribute to the larger debate: Should ministers and government officials allow their likeness to be used for corporate promotions? And if they do not object, does it set a precedent for indirect endorsements of private enterprises?
