Wednesday 5 February 2014

The Sense of an Ending: Julian Barnes: Teacher Resource & Worksheet

·        Worksheet: The Sense of an Ending

While reading the novel, keep following points in your ‘memory’:
1.     Title of the Novel – the Sense of an Ending.
a.      The Ending seems to be that of the old man Anthony Webster who is near the ‘end’ of his journey of life. He ponders – feels nostalgic about the ‘past’. As humans near their end, they crave more for their youthful days. Santiago of ‘The Old Man and the Sea’ also dreams of lions, his fist-fight of younger days and of Manolin when he quite feeble and near his end. . . thus you can illustrate examples of memory reconstruction of past events from the novel.
b.     But, that is not the sense which title conveys. It is part truth. The other part of the sense of an ending is presented in this quote: “You get towards the end of life – no, not life itself, but of something else: the end of any likelihood of change in that life.” (Page 86). Something is ending, in a sense, that it is changing; taking new shape; developing new understanding; reaching to newer perspective; some dawning of new understanding – not about the outside world, but that of self – self-revelation
c.      Apart from this, there are two lives ending in suicide in the novel. That of Robson and Adrian. It leads into the debate on the issue of suicide – issue of eros and thanatos.

2.     The beginning of the novel: novel begins with a kind hazy, vague, blurred fast moving scenes in the beginning of a movie – like shiny wrist (it gets clear later on page no. 78 – “I thought of my inner wrist looking shiny, of my shirt sleeve furled to the elbow.”); steam rising from a wet sink as a hot frying pan (it gets clear on page 23); gouts of sperm circling a plughole (it gets clear on page 68); river rushing nonsensically upstream (it gets clear on page 72); bathwater long gone cold behind a locked door (it gets clear on page 34.)

3.     The scenes in the school classroom and discussion on:
o   Unrest during the reign of King Henry the Eighth in England > novel ends with the word ‘unrest’ > the word recurs 7 times in the novel.
o   Eros and Thanatos
o   First World War
o   Philosophy: “I can’t know what it is that I don’t know.”
o   Robson’s suicide
o   History: lies of victorious or self-delusion of the defeated – memories of those who are neither defeated nor victorious
o   Anthony Webster’s affair with Veronica Mary Elizabeth Ford
o   Weekend visit to Kent > Fords class consciousness > Father Mr. Ford and Son Jack > curious behaviour of Mrs. Sarah Ford > Kitchen > breakfast of eggs > hot pan in wet sink > waving hand at waist height by Sarah
o   Their breakup > stagnation disliked by Veronica > Tony is peaceable with stagnation > Veronica calls his attitude ‘cowardly’ > Tony considers himself ‘peaceable’ > letter from her mother Mrs. Sarah (letter non-existent, only memory)
o   Letter from Adrian (letter non-existent, only memory)> about his ‘going out’ and affair with Veronica > Tony warns against Veronica’s dumping, virginity, ‘damage’ etc in reply letter to Adrian
o   Completes his studies > long vacation in States for 6 months > Affair with Annie, and then to separate without recrimination or blame >‘easy come, easy go’> meantime Adrain commits suicide > he remains unaware
·        Comes back home > letters from Alex > about suicide of Adrian > interesting debate on the idea of Suicide: “philosophically self-evident that suicide was every free person’s right: a logical act when faced with terminal illness or senility (medical suicide - euthanasia; a heroic one when faced with torture or the avoidable deaths of others (Soldiers, warriors rush on the battlefield); a glamorous one in the fury of disappointed love (Romeo-Juliet etc) . . . or spiritual suicides (people taking samathis > living people buried > or suicide is ‘knowingly walk towards death’ and embrace it with deliberate attempt to kill oneself (like Bhagat Singh or Swami Vivekanand).
o   Adrian had explained his reasoning (for suicide): that life is a gift bestowed without anyone asking for it; that the thinking person has a philosophical duty to examine both the nature of life and the conditions it comes with; and that if this person decides to renounce the gift no one asks for, it is a moral and human duty to act on the consequences of that decision.
o   Tony’s marriage with Margaret > her remarrying restaurant man > daughter Susan > her two children > Tony retires > does work of charity for Hospital distributing and recommending books > waiting for his turn . . .
o   Part one ends with: “And that’s a life, isn’t it? Some achievements and some disappointments. It’s been interesting to me, though I wouldn’t complain or be amazed if others found it less so. Maybe, in a way, Adrian knew what he was doing. Not that I would have missed my own life for anything, you understand. I survived. “He survived to tell the tale”—that’s what people say, don’t they? History isn’t the lies of the victors, as I once glibly assured Old Joe Hunt; I know  that now. It’s more the memories of the survivors, most of whom are neither victorious nor defeated.
4.     In part 2 of the move, we have seen:
o   how many things he narrated from his memory turn out to be real/true
o   how Julian Barnes uses memory-narration of Tony to exemplify the theory of deconstruction > which also resemble Post-modernism
o   how the words like ‘memory’, ‘damage’, ‘unrest, ‘history’ etc are revisited to give deeper significance (Ref: Ferdinand de Saussure’s Sign>Signifier>Signified; Derrida’s ‘trace of meaning, decentering meaning, differAnce, free play of meaning etc)
o   Quest for Adrian’s diary for Tony is like King Arthur’s Knight’s quest for Holy Grail > when it is found > what happens?
o   how the narrative turns out to be thriller with some secrets, suspense to be uncovered > and a shocking surprise!
o   How can we reconstruct entire narrative as an objective reader and what difference does it make from than of memory-narrative of Tony?

5.     Please give your responses to these points in the comments below this blog:
o   What is the meaning of phrase ‘Blood Money’ in Veronica’s reply email?
o   How do you decipher the equation: b = s – v x/+ a1 or a2 + v + a1 X s = b?
o   Adrian’s diary is willed to Tony by Sarah Ford. Why did Sarah Ford own it? Why was it in the possession of Veronica?
o   Was the mentally retarded middle aged ‘Adrian’, Tony’s friend who did not commit suicide and was suffering from trauma and thus gone mad, and was living with hidden identity?
o   How was Veronica related to Adrian, the one suffering in care-in-the-community?
o   Do you see any missing block – some dot which is not getting connected with the whole or dot missing to get full sense of the novel - in the plot of this psychological thriller?
o   Do you see any possible reason in the suicide of Adrian Finn?
o   In the light of new revelations, how do you read character of Veronica? Instinctive, manipulative, calculating, stubborn, haughty, sacrificial, trustworthy, good Samaritan?
·        What do you mean by Unreliable Narrator? Is Tony Webster classifiable as Unreliable Narrator?

Study Questions ‘The Sense of an Ending’:
1.            The novel in two parts, narrates almost similar events but from different perspectives. Surprisingly, perspectives are from Tony Webster’s conscious memory-recollection. Make an attempt to tell the story in linear narrative including events from both the parts of ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
2.            "History is that certainty produced at the point where the imperfections of memory meet the inadequacies of documentation." How far can you agree with this definition of Adrian? Justify you answer with reference to your reading of ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
3.            Discussion with Old Joe Hunt, the teacher in school. Pg 4-5 (something happened), pg 10-11 (can’t know-don’t know, history of historians, pg 16-17 (lies of victory, onion, memory – documentation), pg 56 (neither victorious, nor defeated)
4.            “The question of subjective versus objective interpretation, the fact that we need to know the history of the historian in order to understand the version that is being put in front of us.” Do you agree? Give substantial illustrations from ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
5.            Explain how through the memory of Tony Webster, Julian Barnes justifies the universal truth that ‘one cannot know what one does not know’.
6.            “History isn’t the lies of the victors . . . It’s more the memories of the survivors, most of whom are neither victorious nor defeated.” Justify this view of Tony Webster with the help of your reading of ‘The Sense of an Ending’. (Qtd. From pg 56)     
7.            “You still don’t get it. You never did, and you never will. So stop even trying”. Justify with reference to the universal reality that Anthony Webster faces about seeing, perceiving and understanding events of real life in Julian Barnes’s ‘The Sense of an Ending’
8.            “Julian Barnes's Booker-long listed novella is a meditation on ageing, memory and regret.” Justine Jordan
a.                Pg. 80 – In email to Veronica Tony: “. . . one of the differences between youth and age: when we are young, we invent different futures for ourselves; when we are old, we invent different pasts for others.
b.               Pg. 81 – nostalgia = feeling of regret and guilt
c.                Pg 105 – the memory becomes a thing of shreds and patches. It is a bit like the black box airplanes carry to record what happens in a crash. If nothing goes wrong, the tape erases itself. Therefore, if you do crash, it is obvious why you did; if you do not, and then the log of your journey is much less clear.
9.            “It would be a mistake to dismiss this as a mere psychological thriller. It is in fact a tragedy, like Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw, which it resembles.” Anita Brookner
a.                (Key: Governess tries to save kids from haunting memory of sexually abused children in form of ghost visitation – ultimate death of Miles, the boy – debate on the real existence of Ghost or mere representation of haunting memory)
10.        It's a book about history and how we recall events.” Robin Leggett
11.        The Sense of an Ending, fittingly, deals with grave existential questions.”   A. J. Kirby)
a.                (KEY: the theme of suicide: Two suicides – Robson and Adrian Finn. Pg 17 – Robson’s suicide. Pg 47-49 – Adrian Finn’s suicide)
12.        “Mr. Barnes plays with the maxim that it’s better to regret the things you have done than the things you haven’t, and thus rages against living life complacently.” A. J. Kirby
13.        “The Sense of an Ending” looks at the ways in which people distort or tailor the past in an effort to mythologize their own lives. - Michiko Kakutani.
14.        Put your argument in light of Roland Barthes views: ‘Myth converts history into nature. And the task of the mythographer is to rediscover the element of history (truth-fact-past) that motivates the myth, to elicit what is specific to a given time and place, asking what interests are served by the naturalization of particular convictions and values.’
15.        The Sense of an Ending is a short book, but not a slight one. In it, Julian Barnes reveals crystalline truths that have taken a lifetime to harden. He has honed their edges, and polished them to a high gleam.”- Liesl Schillinger
16.        ‘Damage’ recurs as a motif in the novel. Whom do you think is ‘damaged’ and who is the ‘damager’?
a.                Damage : the letter written by Tony to Adrain and Veronica
b.               It damages Veronica’s relation with Adrain
c.                Perhaps, leads Adrain to meet Sarah Ford > their affair
d.               Sarah’s pregnancy > which may have lead to Adrain Finn’s suicide!
e.                The child, names Adrain is born with metal retardness > damage caused by suicide of Adrain to Sarah while she is pregnant > or her middle-aged pregnancy
f.                 The letter damages several lives > Veronica, Adrain, Sarah and young Adrain
17.        “Plot is not the main point; character and life are Barnes’ focus.” - Whispering Gums
a.                It would be injustice to Barnes if we say that the novel is plotless or poorly constructed plot. It has a beginning, middle and the end. He is able to pull readers towards climax and the effect of peripatetia and anagnorisis leads to the catastrophe – the final revelation of the identity of 40 years old abnormal Adrian helps in holding on the plot.
b.               And yet, the telling of life, the history, the memory seen through a particular character is very important in this novel.
c.                At times, the plot seem to suffer because of the character’s meditating memory and nostalgic hindsight on past life.
18.        “The book’s plot reads like that of a thriller paperbackfull of vengeful ex-girlfriends, youth suicide, and illicit sex.” Explain. (Geoff Mak)
19.        “Eros and Thanatos . . . Sex and death. . . Or love and death, if you prefer. The erotic principle, in any case, coming into conflict with the death principle. And what ensues from that conflict.” How far this statement encircles the central theme of the novel The Sense of an Ending’. (Key: First explain concept of Eros and Thanatos and then illustrate from the text – love and suicide incident – and conflict in the memory of narrator)
20.        The Beginning of the novel. Write a critique on the beginning of the novel.
a.                “The argument in both the beginning and end of the book,” said Barnes, “is about where responsibility lies. And to what extent something like a suicide is entirely the responsibility of the person who has done it, or is there a whole chain of responsibility. And there usually is.”[1]
21.        The Title – ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
22.        Discussion on ‘History’ in school. Write a critique on the classroom scene where teacher and students discuss ‘History’.
23.        The Ending of ‘The Sense of an Ending’: Psychological thriller, suspense, the group of mentally retarded young people in 30s > Initially, Tony cannot see (You just don’t get it, do you? But then you never did – Veronica) the features of Adrian in one of the young man > suddenly realizes > realization dawn on him > yet another time ‘did not get it right > thought him to be Veronica and Adrian’s son > the truth, the secret is revealed, rather casually > he is ‘Adrian, son of Sarah & brother of Veronica > Tony joins the dots – blood money as per Veronica, Sarah’s 500 pounds for the happiness she had with Adrian, Veronica sacrifices her happiness and takes care of mentally retarded Adrian, veronica as instinctive or manipulative (rather who is calculative and manipulative), all his allegations for Veronica and Adrian came to be true for his own character, not only his ‘words’ in the letter to Adrian came ‘life’, but what he said and thought and memorized as true history of survivor, proved to be limited interpretation of the events, it rather mirrored Tony’s true self to himself – leads to the deep introspection about oneself, when one passes judgments on others.
24.        Prose style: “Elegant, witty and playful, and he often employs techniques associated with postmodern writing - unreliable narrators, a self-conscious linguistic style, an intertextual blending of different narrative forms - which serve to foreground the process of literary creation, the gap between experience and language, and the subjectivity of 'truth' and 'reality”.
25.        Write an essay on ‘The Sense of an Ending’ as a Postmodernist novel.
a.                Key: Postmodernism borrows from modernism disillusionment with the givens of society; a penchant for irony; the self-conscious “play” within the work of art; fragmentation and ambiguity; and a destructured, decentered, dehumanized subject. But while modernism presented a fragmented view of human history (as in Eliot’s The Waste Land – [1925]), this fragmentation was seen as tragic. Despite their pessimism, modernist works still hope, following Matthew Arnold a generation before, that art may e able to provide the unity, coherence, and meaning that has been lost in most of modern life, as church and nation have failed to do. One can locate this hope, faint as it sometimes is, in such memorable passages as the Molly Bloom section that closes Joyce’s Ullysses (1922). In contrast, postmodernism not only does not mourn the loss of meaning but celebrates the activity of fragmentation. Whereas modernism still seeks a rational meaning in a work of art, postmodernism explores the provisionality and irrationality of art.
26.        Unreliable narrator: “Was this their exact exchange? Almost certainly not. Still, it is my best memory of their exchange.” (Pg 19)
27.        In the introduction to the Folio Society edition of the novel he wrote a couple of years ago, he called it ‘the most perfectly deployed example of the unreliable narrator’, and explained its method thus: ‘The storyteller isn’t up to the level of his own story; he is a bumbler obliged to convey an intrigue of operatic passion which he himself only partially understands. . . . ’. In light of this remark, give your critique of the narrative style in ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
28.        “The point is not about the ‘ugliness of letter’ which causes ‘damage’; it is rather about what he ‘thinks’ about it and how he ‘memorizes’ it”. Explain with reference to your reading of ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
29.        ‘It is not about what we ‘do’, it is about how we ‘remember’ what we have done?’. Illustrate with reference to the novel ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
30.        How is the so-called ‘ugly letter’ mentioned in Part One of the novel? How does the real letter presented in Part Two to the readers prove the point of ‘adequacy of document’ and ‘imperfections of memory’ in the history?
31.        “Real literature was about psychological, emotional and social truth as demonstrated by the actions and reflections of its protagonists; the novel was about character developed over time.” How does this line from the novel illustrate character development of ‘Anthony Webster’ in ‘The Sense of an Ending’?
32.        Julian Barnes reference to ‘accumulation’ and ‘responsibility’ is an attempt to secularize Hindu Karmic philosophy in rational language to make it understandable to the generation of 21st century. How far do you agree with it.
33.        Barnes dramatizes this chain of responsibility against a backdrop of class difference : Justify your answer. (See answer in ‘Class Difference print out or in the interview on this weblink)
1.              Julian Barnes center in not to discuss ‘class difference’ or ‘culture’. They are rather shifted on the periphery of his discourse that centers on ‘memory’, ‘history’, ‘time’ and ‘quest for truth’. Illustrate with your reading of ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
34.        Literature - mirror - photograph - x-ray image - axe to break frozen self - dry coconut    
a.                Cultural degradation – in form of teenage affairs, sexual behaviour, pregnant girls in school, teenage-adult suicides, easy-come-easy-go-relations, divorce etc
b.               Class difference – Fords vs Webster & the damage caused by such behaviour
c.                Barnes’s centre in not these issues of British Middle Class culture or society. Why?
d.               What does the text do as a part of philosophical thinking?
e.                It centers on ‘why people lie – falsehood; question of truth.
f.                 Here it is not the truth or falsehood of others or told to others; it is rather the ones told to the ‘self’.
g.               Why we memorize false facts? Why we construct convenient memory?
35.        Explain Ann Gray’s three propositions on ‘knowability’ with illustrations from the novel ‘The Sense of an Ending’.
a.                Identifying what is knowable
b.               identifying and acknowledging the relationship of the knower and the known
c.                What is the procedure for ‘knowing’?
36.         "We thought it was a book that spoke to the humankind in the 21st Century." Dame Stella Rimington (chair of the judges for the 2011 Man Booker Prize.)
a.                 Key:
1.       The ‘inadequacy of documentation’ and the damage caused by it – The people of 21st century ‘keep record’ of their thinking, travels, doings and happening over social media and in cyber space. If document like a letter once written by Tony and then imperfectly memorized by him in complacent way caused ‘great unrest’ to him, what can ‘life documented on cyber space’ do if revisited? It gives one of those questions to 21st century people which Edward Snowded alarmed people against political powers / governments. People may be posting several things. It may not be illegal today. But the power redefines the rules and something that was once neither legal nor illegal, turns down to be illegal. Which may bring great unrest to an individual.
2.      Secondly, 21st century habit of communication is not letter writing. It is email or sms. There is difference in communication in letter writing and eCommunication. There is  a lot of time between the written letter and its posting and postman delivering to the given address. The communication can be stopped at various point if we realize that the words used in letter should not have been used. We can tear the letter before posting or retrieve from post office before it is delivered. In email or sms, that is not possible. Once clicked, it is gone. No regret or remorse can stop it from delivering. Then, all these messages over whatsapp or social media are saved by people. We may have forgotten that we have communicated as such. But it may come back to us as screen shot of our forgotten communication. The damage caused by such  communication is terrible. The 21st cen people will have to grapple with it. The letter of Tony when read by him at older age gives him great unrest. He says he is not that Tony who wrote this letter. It was the yonger, angrier, damaged, envious Tony. Thus, this becomes significant to 21st readers to understand that what we communicate today, may come back to us and it may give great unrest.
3.      Thirdly, like the metaphor of black box in airplane, we do not read our memory until and unless we meet with an accident in our relations. If there is no accident, we do not visit our memory. After accident, unlike in black box, we start looking at past events with newer developments in relations. We colour past events with new insights. We memorise it not the way it happened, but the way other events are shaping our relations. We construct chain of events / chain of responsibilities in our memory about past events with reference to new or recent happenings. This is something very significant for the 21st cen people whose life moves much faster than that of people of all previous ages/centuries.
4.      Lastly, in this Post-truth era, it is significant to realize that we cannot rely even our own memory. Our memory may be imperfect. We may have constructed it to comfort or console us. The events may have happened it quite an antithetical way then the way we have memorized it. The inadequacy of document will lead us to believe in the lies we have imperfectly memories and thus historicized.   




Quiz
Click here to appear in quiz on this novel







[1] http://www.themillions.com/2013/02/the-league-of-ordinary-gentlemen-a-conversation-with-julian-barnes.html
[2] http://www.themillions.com/2013/02/the-league-of-ordinary-gentlemen-a-conversation-with-julian-barnes.html

Which of the following book cover suits well with the central theme of the novel:






Monday 27 January 2014

Research: The Review of Related Literature (The Literature Review)

Cedalion standing on the shoulders of Orion from Blind Orion


New Testament Evangelists (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) on the shoulders on Old Testament Prophets (Ezekiel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Moses)


Review of related literature: 

  • This makes for the foundation - the stepping stones - for new research. It is like standing on the shoulder of the giants so that we can see farther than the giants (previous scholars) have visualized.
  • One should have birds-eye-view of the work done in the area of research which is to be explored. After understanding the work done, the research scholar should think of taking a step further in new direction in the research under consideration. The road-map of this new direction should be chalked out in research proposal. (While doing an online open course (MOOC) on Coursera - offered by University of London, i came across these articles on Literature Review. All three of them are worth reading: 

The Examples of Literature Review:

  1. Summarize
  2. Tabular Format
  3. What to do and what not to do
  4. Step by step guide
Important Steps in the Process of Literature Review
1. Make a table of all works reviewed or considered for review
2. Annotated Bibliography of selected works: It can be in chronological or alphabetical order.
3. Reorganise the 'order': Your 'hypothesis' shall guide you in reorganizing. This re-ordering depends on the flow of your arguments. Make your own trajectory.
4. Now write introductory and concluding lines. These lines shall be written to 'hook paragraphs' with each other. Write in such a way so the 'transitions' from one paragraph to another helps the 'flow of ideas'.
5. Now write 'Concluding Paragraph' of the 'Review of Related Literature'. Start with clear, strong and concrete statement. Make your conclusions about your 'Literature Review'.
6. Now, write 'Introduction'. The thesis statement shall be 'last' in the Introduction and 'first' in the Conclusion.

Video recording of the sessions on 'Literature Review'

Part 1: Ontology & Epistemology


Part 2: What, Why and How of Literature Review:


Part 3: Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Literature Review



The Presentation:


1. A focused reading with a specific purpose2. WHAT IS A LITERATURE REVIEW? • Many students are instructed, as part of their research program, to perform a literature reviewliterature review, without understanding what it is. Read more: http://www.experiment-resources.com/what-is-a-literature-review.html#ixzz1QGfAxinx3. Sources essential for LT • Sources are generally described as primary, secondary, or tertiary. • Primary: Primary sources are “materials that you are directly writing about, the raw materials of your own research.” • Secondary: Secondary sources are “books and articles in which other researchers report the results of their research based on (their) primary data or sources.” • Tertiary: Tertiary sources are “books and articles based on secondary sources, on the research of others.” – Tertiary sources synthesize and explain the work of others and might be useful early in your research, but they are generally weak support for your own arguments… at times they are challenged in your argument!4. What is Literature Review? • A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. • Occasionally researchers are asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliography), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or also a chapter in M.Phil/Ph.D.thesis.5. What is the purpose ofWhat is the purpose of Literature Review?  • Purpose - to convey what knowledge and ideaswhat kn owledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and whathave been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are.their strengths and weaknesses are. • As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding conceptdefined by a guiding concept (e.g., our research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). • It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries6. What is ‘not’ Literature Review? – Not - chronological catalog of all of the sources, but an evaluation, integrating the previous research together, – But - it is to explain how it integrates into the proposed research program. All sides of an argument must be clearly explained, to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted. • Not - collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources. • But - good literature review should also have some evaluation of the quality and findings of the research.7. Why do a Literature Review? • to identify gapsidentify gaps in the research area • to avoid reinventing the wheelavoid reinventing the wheel • to carry on from where others have alreadycarry on from where others have already completedcompleted • to identify other people working in the sameidentify other people working in the same fieldsfields • to fathom the depth of knowledgefathom the depth of knowledge of your subject area8. Why do LR? • to identify opposing viewsopposing views • to put your work into wider perspectiveput your work into wider perspective • to identify methodsmethods that could be relevant to your project. • to identify seminal worksidentify seminal works in your area • to provide the intellectual context for your own work, enabling you to position your project in relationproject in relation to other work9. Two important objectives of LR:Two important objectives of LR: • Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in two areas: 1.information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles and books 2.critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid studies10. A literature review must doA literature review must do these things:these things: • be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question we are developing • synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known • identify areas of controversy in the literature • formulate questions that need further research11. Ask yourself questions like these: • What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define? • What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory? methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g. on the effectiveness of a new procedure)? qualitative research (e.g., studies )?12. Ask yourself questions like these: • What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g., journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What discipline am I working in (e.g., Engineering, Psychology, Humanities, Pharmacy, Management)? • How good was my information seeking? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?13. Ask yourself questions like these: • Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they deal with them? • Instead of just listing and summarizing items, do I assess them, discussing strengths and weaknesses? • Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective? • Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?14. Ask yourself questions like these about each book or article you include: • Has the author formulated a problem/issue? • Is it clearly defined? Is its significance (scope, severity, relevance) clearly established? • Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective? • What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)? • What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychological, developmental, feminist)?15. Ask yourself questions like these about each book or article you include: • Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include literature taking positions she or he does not agree with? • In a research study, how good are the basic components of the study design (e.g., population, intervention, outcome)? • How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions validly based upon the data and analysis?16. Ask yourself questions like these about each book or article you include: • How does the author structure the argument? Can you "deconstruct" the flow of the argument to see whether or where it breaks down logically (e.g., in establishing cause-effect relationships)? • In what ways does this book or article contribute to our understanding of the problem under study, and in what ways is it useful for practice? What are the strengths and limitations? • How does this book or article relate to the specific thesis or question I am developing?17. Four Examples of Literature Review • Step by Step – drafting LR: Psychology. Systematic arrangement… • Ph.D. Thesis on ELT – Engineering Colleges in Tami . Summarizing… • Example with teacher’s remark on LR. What to do and what not to… • CALL – The best of all examples…18. Web Tools for LR:19. Web Tools helpful in LR: • Bookmarking sites: e.g. www.delicious.com/ • Google Docs – www.docs.google.com - Prepare a ‘form’ – easy to manage records in auto-generated spread sheet. - https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDBCQi1PeVduZTFTVHY3WnFyWktCY3c6MQ20. Reference: • Read more: http://www.experiment-resources.com/what-is-a-literature-review.html#ixzz1QGfmJZeW http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/literature_review.html http://library.ucsc.edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review • Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination (Published in association with The Open University) Dr. Christopher Hart. • Any book on Research Methodology for respective subjects deals with ‘Review of Literature’. • Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-By-Step Approach. Los Angeles: Sage. (call number McHenry Stacks H62 C5859) • Machi, L.A. (2009). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. (call number McHenry Stacks LB1047.3 M33) • Deakin University. (2009). The Literature Review. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Author. Retrieved 4th September 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.deakin.edu.au/library/findout/research/litrev.php • The University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center. (2009). Writer's Handbook: Common Writing Assignments: Review of Literature. Madison, Wisconsin: Author. Retrieved 4th September 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html http://www.writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html http://library.ucsc.edu/print/help/howto/write-a-literature-review • Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional And Systematic Techniques (Paperback)by Jill Jesson, Lydia Matheson, Fiona M. Lacey (Sage Pub)21. Works cited:Afolabi, M. (1992) 'The review of related literature in research' International journal of information and library research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59-66.Bourner, T. (1996) 'The research process: four steps to success', in Greenfield, T. (ed), Research methods: guidance for postgraduates, Arnold, London.Bruce, C. S. (1990) 'Information skills coursework for postgraduate students: investigation and response at the Queensland University of Technology' Australian Academic & Research Libraries, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 224-232.Bruce, C. (1993) 'When enough is enough: or how should research students delimit the scope of their literature review?', in Challenging the Conventional Wisdom in Higher Education: Selected Contributions Presented at the Ninteeth Annual National Conference and Twenty-First Birth . pp. 435-439.Bruce, C. S. (1994) 'Research student's early experiences of the dissertation literature review' Studies in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 217-229.Bruce, C. (1994) 'Supervising literature reviews', in Zuber-Skerritt, O. and Ryan, Y. (eds), Quality in postgraduate education, Kogan Page, London.Bruce, C. S. (1997) 'From Neophyte to expert: counting on reflection to facilitate complex conceptions of the literature review', in Zuber-Skerritt, O. (ed), Frameworks for postgraduate education, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW.Caspers, J. S (1998) 'Hands-on instruction across the miles: using a web tutorial to teach the literature review research process' Research Strategies, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 187-197.Cooper, H. M. (1988) 'The structure of knowledge synthesis' Knowledge in Society, vol. 1, pp. 104-126Cooper, H. M. (1989) Integrating research : a guide for literature reviews, 2nd ed, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif. • Leedy, P. D. (1997) Practical research: planning and design, 6th ed, Merrill, Upper Saddle River, N.J.Libutti, P.& Kopala, M. (1995) 'The doctoral student, the dissertation, and the library: a review of the literature' Reference Librarian, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 5-25.Mauch, J. E.& Birch, J. W. (2003) Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation: a handbook for students and faculty, 5th ed, Marcel Dekker, New York.

Friday 17 January 2014

Worksheet: Screening Movie The Da Vinci Code based on novel by Dan Brown

Worksheet: 'The Da Vinci Code'


The Da Vinci Code, Columbia Pictures (2006), directed by Ron Howard from a script by Akiva Goldsman (based on the novel by Dan Brown); producers Brian Grazer and John Calley. Cinematography by Salvatore Totino; score by Hans Zimmer. With Tom Hanks (Robert Langston), Audrey Tautou (Sophie Neveu), Ian McKellen (Leigh Teabing), Jean Reno (Bezu Fache), Paul Bettany (Silas), Alfred Molina (Bishop Aringarosa). 148 minutes. (Goldsman and Brown)
Pre-viewing Task:

·      Genre:

             Narration:
o   What is suspense thriller?
o   Have you come across any novels by Sidney Sheldon?
o   Have you watched any film by Alfred Hitchcock?
·        Central Theme:
o   What is conspiracy theory?
o   What is conspiracy fiction?
o   What is Mary Magdalene's role in the history of Christianity.
§  “The power of the female and her ability to produce life was once very sacred, but it posed a threat to the rise of the predominantly male Church, and so the sacred feminine was demonized and called unclean.
§  It was man, not God, who created the concept of 'original sin,' whereby Eve tasted of the apple and caused the downfall of the human race. Woman, once the sacred giver of life, was now the enemy."
§  “This concept of woman as life-bringer was the foundation of ancient religion.”
§  “Sadly, Christian philosophy decided to embezzle the female's creative power by ignoring biological truth and making man the Creator.”
§  “Genesis tells us that Eve was created from Adam's rib. Woman became an offshoot of man. And a sinful one at that. Genesis was the beginning of the end for the goddess."
* "It's important to remember that the ancients' view of sex was entirely opposite from ours today. Sex begot new life - the ultimate miracle - and miracles could be performed only by a god. The ability of the woman to produce life from her womb made her sacred. A god... It's a deeply sacrosanct ceremony".

While-viewing Task:

While watching the movie The Da Vinci Code, keep an eye on following questions:
1.     Compare the beginning of the Novel (Brown) and that of the movie. What difference do you notice? Which narrative seems to be more effective? Give your reasons.
2.     How is Christianity challenged in novel? What sort of religious controversy is discussed?
3.     Which truth from the life of Jesus Christ was buried and constant attempts were made to hide some facts? WHY?
4.     Da Vinci’s painting is symbolically observed by symbologists like Leigh Teabing and Robert Langdon. How do they read symbols? What do they deconstruct in the process of re-reading Leonardo Da Vinci’s painting?
5.     Explain the symbolism in ‘Holy Grail’? How is this symbol re-interpreted in the novel by Dan Brown?
6.     Concept clarification: Watch carefully to understand following terms:
a. Symbology (Iconography)
b.     Sarcophagus (Mary Magdalene's Sarcophagus in 'The Da Vinci Code')
c.      Merovingian Dynasty
d.     Opus Dei
e.      Priory of Scion
o. Sangreal = (Sang (blood) + Real (royal) / San (Holy) + Greal (Grail)
p. Pantacle (Up and Down Triangle) = Male + Female = Creation of Life  

7. How does the portrayal of Sophie's character in the movie observe the sanctity of 'Feminine Sacredness'?

Film Review - Da Vinci Code



Post-viewing Task: 

  1. Brown states on his website that his books are not anti-Christian, though he is on a 'constant spiritual journey' himself, and says that his book The Da Vinci Code is simply "an entertaining story that promotes spiritual discussion and debate" and suggests that the book may be used "as a positive catalyst for introspection and exploration of our faith."
  2.  “Although it is obvious that much of what Brown presented in his novel as absolutely true and accurate is neither of those, some of that material is of course essential to the intrigue, and screenwriter Akiva Goldsman has retained the novel's core, the Grail-related material: the sacred feminine, Mary Magdalene's marriage, the Priory of Sion, certain aspects of Leonardo's art, and so on[1].” How far do you agree with this observation of Norris J. Lacy?
  3. (If)You have studied ‘Genesis’ (The Bible), ‘The Paradise Lost’ (John Milton) and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (Dan Brown). Which of the narrative/s seem/s to be truthful? Whose narrative is convincing to the contemporary young mind?
  4. What harm has been done to humanity by the biblical narration or that of Milton’s in The Paradise Lose? What sort of damage does narrative like ‘The Vinci Code’ do to humanity?
  5. What difference do you see in the portrayal of 'Ophelia' (Kate Winslet) in Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet, 'Elizabeth' (Helena Bonham Carter) in Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or 'Hester Prynne' (Demi Moore) in Roland Joffé's The Scarlet Letter' or David Yates's 'Harmione Granger' (Emma Watson) in last four Harry Potter films - and 'Sophie Neuve' (Audrey Tautau) in Ron Howard's The Da Vinci Code? How would justify your answer?
  6. Do novel / film lead us into critical (deconstructive) thinking about your religion? Can we think of such conspiracy theory about Hindu religious symbols / myths?
  7. Have you come across any similar book/movie, which tries to deconstruct accepted notions about Hindu religion or culture and by dismantling it, attempts to reconstruct another possible interpretation of truth?
  8. When we do traditional reading of the novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’, Robert Langdon, Professor of Religious Symbology, Harvard University emerges as protagonist and Sir Leigh Teabing, a British Historian as antagonist. Who will claim the position of protagonist if we do atheist reading of the novel?
  9. Explain Ann Gray’s three propositions on ‘knowability’ with illustrations from the novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’.
a.       1) Identifying what is knowable 
b.      2) identifying and acknowledging the relationship of the knower and the known
c.      3) What is the procedure for ‘knowing’?




    http://goo.gl/forms/EdlbSdH3aj

    Bibliography

    Brown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Great Britain: Transworld Publisher, 2003.
    The Da Vinci Code. By Akiva Goldsman and Dan Brown. Dir. Ron Howard. Perf. Tom Hanks. Prods. Brian Grazer and John Calley. 2006.






    [1] From: Arthuriana, Vol. 16, No. 4, SARACENS IN MALORY (WINTER 2006), pp. 83-85Published by: Scriptorium PressStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27870793.

    Thursday 9 January 2014

    UGC - NET and Gujarat SET (English): Online Question Papers

    UGC / CBSE - NET and Gujarat SET (English): Online Question Papers

    This blog is for those students/scholars/teachers who are preparing for UGC (now CBSE) NET (English Literature) examination. The students of the Department of English, M.K. Bhavnagar University have prepared these online tests. All those who appear in this online test will get their grades with right answers in email. Scroll down for important links to know more about NET exam dates, notification and paper pattern.

    You are requested to inform on dilipbarad (at) gmail (dot) com for grade-sheet after appearing in the test.

    Please give correct email id, if you want to receive correct answers of these quizzes.

    Click on these links to practice online test on previous years' UGC NET and GSET question papers:
    1. English Paper II - Sept.13/12

    2. English Paper III - Sept/13/12

    3. English Paper II - J3013

    4. English Paper III - J3013

    5. English Paper II - Dec 2013

    6. English Paper III - Dec 2013
    7. GSET English Paper II - Sept 2016
    8. GSET English Paper III - Sept 2016
    9. NET English Paper 2 - Jan 2017 (New)
    10. NET English Paper 3 - Jan 2017 (New)
    11. GSET English Paper II - 2002 (New)
    12. GSET Eng P-II Aug- 17/12 (New)
    13. GSET Eng P - III Aug - 2017 (New)
    Please do not hesitate to write on above given email id, if you face any problem and report errors and omissions.